Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Babulal Gupta And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra, State ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 15578 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15578 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2021

Bombay High Court
Suresh Babulal Gupta And Another vs The State Of Maharashtra, State ... on 28 October, 2021
Bench: S.B. Shukre, Anil Laxman Pansare
                                                                5.wp4184.2021.odt
                                             1/2



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                         WRIT PETITION NO. 4184 OF 2021
  1. Suresh Babulal Gupta
  aged about 64 years, Occ.: Business,
  R/o. Vighnesh Vertex, Tikekar Road,
  Dhantoli, Nagpur.

  2. Deepak Shankarlal Jaiswal
  aged about 60 years, Occ.: Business,
  R/o. Gajanan Mandir Road,
  Wadgaon Ward, Chandrapur.                          .... PETITIONERS

                                    // VERSUS //

  1. The State of Maharashtra
  State Excise, Mantralaya,
  Mumbai, through its Secretary.

  2. The Collector, State Excise,
  Chandarpur.

  3. The Superintendent,
  State Excise, Chandrapur.                          .... RESPONDENTS

  Mr. S.S. Godbole, Advocate for petitioners.
  Mr. S.M. Ukey, Addl.GP for respondent Nos.1 to 3/State.
  ________________________________________________________________
  s




                                CORAM        : SUNIL B. SHUKRE, AND
                                               ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.

DATE : 28th OCTOBER, 2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT: [PER: S.B. Shukre, J.]

Heard Shri Godbole, learned counsel for the petitioners

and Mr. S.M. Ukey, learned Addl. GP who appears by waiving notice

for respondents.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The matter is

heard finally by the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

5.wp4184.2021.odt

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners'

application for renewal of CL-III License dated 28.07.2021 is not

being decided by the respondent No.2. We are of the view that

purpose of the petition can be served by issuing necessary directions

in the matter.

4. The petition is partly allowed.

5. The respondent No.2 is directed to decide the

application dated 28.07.2021 filed by the petitioners seeking

renewal of CL-III License, in accordance with law, as expeditiously

as possible and preferably within three months from the date of the

appearance of the petitioner before the respondent No.2.

6. The petitioner to appear before the respondent No.2 on

2nd November, 2021.

Rule accordingly. No costs.

          s

                             JUDGE                                  JUDGE
Prity





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter