Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15182 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021
939.WP.11284.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11284 OF 2021
PRIYANKA SUNIL KADAM
VERSUS
SUNIL GANGARAM KADAM
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana D. Reddy
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 21.10.2021
PER COURT :
Heard.
2. The petitioner is the mother of the child stated to be aged 14 years challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned District Judge in a proceeding initiated by the respondent, who is the father of the child, under Section 6 of the Guardians and Wards Act, read with Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, whereby, declaring him entitled to have custody of the child.
3. Apparently, the child is in the custody of the petitioner who is his mother and natural guardian. Irrespective of the fact that even the respondent is a natural guardian being a father, the child is aged 14 years and has been in the custody of the petitioner till date.
4. Considering the above state of affairs, issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 16.12.2021. Till then operation of the impugned judgment and order shall stand stayed. In addition to the regular mode of service, the petitioner shall serve the respondent privately by Registered Speed Post.
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!