Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14997 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2021
First Appeal No.55/2007
:: 1 ::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO.55 OF 2007
Rukhmabai w/o Nimba Patil & ors. ... APPELLANTS
VERSUS
Sahebrao Chaitram Patil & ors. ... RESPONDENTS
.......
Shri S.S. Jadhavar, Advocate for appellants
Shri Girish Rane, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Shri A.B. Gatne, Advocate for respondent No.3.
.......
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.
DATE : 13th OCTOBER, 2021
ORDER:
This is an appeal for enhancement of
compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
(Tribunal) on account of death occurred in vehicular accident.
Only a sum of Rs.1,03,500/- has been awarded as
compensation inclusive of medical expenditure. It thus
appears that, grossly inadequate compensation has been
awarded for the death that occurred in the year 2001. The
claim petition was filed by the widow and two sons of the
deceased Nimba, who was said to have been doing
agriculture.
First Appeal No.55/2007 :: 2 ::
2. Heard. Learned counsel for the appellants -
claimants would submit that, the deceased was the sole bread
winner of the family. Over Rs.60,000/- were spent towards
medical expenditure. The Tribunal has awarded only
Rs.7000/- on that count. Nothing has been awarded towards
loss of consortium and love and affection. Notional income of
the deceased was considered at Rs.18,000/- per annum.
Learned counsel, therefore, urged for substantial
enhancement of the compensation.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent Insurance
Company would submit that, there was no evidence about the
income of the deceased and medical expenditure incurred.
The deceased was more than 65 years of age. His sons have
been earning. The Tribunal has thus granted just and
reasonable compensation. He, therefore, urged for dismissal
of the appeal.
4. Considered the rival submissions. Perused the
impugned award and the relevant evidence on record. The
deceased was 60 plus when he breathed his last. He was
agriculturist by profession. On his demise, the land has been
inherited by the claimants. This Court, therefore, does not
find any reason to interfere with the quantum of
First Appeal No.55/2007 :: 3 ::
compensation awarded by the Tribunal on account of loss of
dependency.
5. When the impugned award was passed, the Apex
Court judgments in case of National Insurance Company
Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others [ (2017) 16 SCC 680 ].
and Magma General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Nanu
Ram Alias Chuhru Ram & ors., [ (2018) 18 SCC 130] were not
in the field. The compensation, therefore, needs to be
awarded in terms of the Apex Court dictum in these two
authorities.
6. On account of loss of consortium and loss of love
and affection, each of the claimants is awarded Rs.40,000/-.
While a sum of Rs.30,000/- is granted towards loss of estate
and funeral expenses. The record indicates that, the
deceased was admitted to a private hospital. He died long
after he met with the accident. There is, therefore, no reason
to doubt the claim of the appellants that they spent not less
than Rs.60,000/- towards medical expenditure. The
appellants would, therefore, be entitled to that much amount
also. Thus, the total amount of compensation comes to
Rs.96,000/- granted by the Tribunal towards loss of
First Appeal No.55/2007 :: 4 ::
dependency), plus Rs.1,10,000/- plus Rs.60,000/- =
Rs.3,06,000/-. No interest, however, would be awarded on
the amount of compensation granted towards loss of love and
affection. In the result, the appeal partly succeeds in terms of
the following order :
ORDER
(i) The impugned award granting compensation of
Rs.1,03,500/- is enhanced to Rs.3,06,000/-.
(ii) The respondents No.1 and 2 shall pay interest @
7.5% p.a. on the amount of Rs.1,86,000/- from the date of
the claim petition to the date of payment of the entire
amount.
(iii) The respondents shall pay interest @ 7.5% p.a. on
the sum of Rs.1,20,000/- from the date of this order to the
date of payment of the said amount.
(iv) Due adjustment be given to the amount already
paid/ deposited by the respondent - Insurance Company.
( R. G. AVACHAT ) JUDGE
fmp/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!