Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vidarbha Irrigaion Development ... vs Vishweshwar Alias Dattatraya S/O ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 14760 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14760 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vidarbha Irrigaion Development ... vs Vishweshwar Alias Dattatraya S/O ... on 8 October, 2021
Bench: Pushpa V. Ganediwala
 xob104.17.odt                                                                        1


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                        NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                        CROSS-OBJECTION NO.104 OF 2017
                                       IN
                        FIRST APPEAL NO. 368 OF 2015 (D)

          Vidarbha Irrigation Development
          Corporation, through its Executive
          Engineer, Lower Wardha Project
          Divison, Tahsil and District Wardha
                                                          ...APPELLANT

                                   VERSUS

 1.       Vishweshwar alias Dattatraya s/o Gulab
          Arsad (deceased) aged 62 years,
          Occupation - cultivator, resident of
          Neri (Mirzapur), Tahsil Arvi,
          District Wardha, Now at present
          resident of Arvi, Tahsil, Arvi,
          District Wardha.

          (Legal Heirs of deceased)

 1a.      Smt. Usha wd/o Vishweshwar Arsad,
          Aged - 63 years, Occupation- household,

 1b.      Arvind s/o Vishweshwar Arsad,
          Aged - 45 years, Occupation- cultivator,

 1c.      Manish s/o Vishweshwar Arsad,
          Aged - 35 years, Occupation- cultivator,

          Nos.1a to 1c all resident of Arvi, Tahsil
          Arvi, District Wardha.

 2.       Sou. Ranjana W/o Hemant Gandole,
          Aged about 42 years, Occ: - household,
          Resident of Kotwal Nagar, Nagpur,
          District Nagpur.                              ...CROSS-OBJECTORS

 3.       The State of Maharashtra through Collector,
          Wardha, Tahsil and District Wardha.

::: Uploaded on - 14/10/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 16/10/2021 20:51:56 :::
  xob104.17.odt                                                                         2




 4.       Sub Divisional Officer and Special
          Land Acquisition Officer, Arvi,
          District Wardha.                                 ...RESPONDENTS
 ____________________________________________________________________
 Shri Abhijit Parihar, Advocate for appellant.
 Shri Tushar Darda, Advocate for cross-objectors.
 Ms H.N. Jaipurkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.3 & 4.
 ____________________________________________________________________

                               CORAM : PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.

DATED : 8th OCTOBER, 2021.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

Heard.

2. In this cross-objection, cross-objectors/legal representatives

of original claimant take exception to the judgment and award dated

19.01.2012 passed in Land Acquisition Case No.370 of 2005 by the

learned 4thJoint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Wardha, wherein the

learned Reference Court awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.

1,00,000/- per hectare for the dry crop land of the cross-objectors

situated at Survey Nos.33 and 36 admeasuring 1.07 H.R. and 1.34,

respectively, village Neri, Tahsil Arvi, District Wardha .

3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have pointed out

that the present appeal came to be withdrawn by the appellant V.I.D.C

before the Lok-Adalat held on 22.04.2018. Learned counsel further

submit that this matter can be disposed of as the issue involved in this

case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Cross Objection No.31

of 2018 in First Appeal No.433 of 2014, wherein this Court has

awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.1,68,000/- per hectare for dry

crop land of the claimants therein situated at Mahimapur, Tahsil Arvi,

District Wardha decided on 05.02.2020.

4. A perusal of the judgment in the aforesaid cross-objection

would reflect that this Court adjudicated the award in the above cross-

objection as the appellant/VIDC had accepted the said amount by

withdrawing the appeal before the Lok-Adalat, which was preferred

against the judgment and award of the Reference Court dated

02.05.2014 in Land Acquisition Case No.241 of 2006 wherein the

Reference Court awarded the compensation at the rate of Rs.1,68,000/-

per hectare for dry crop land situated at Mauza Nababpur, Tahsil Arvi,

District Wardha.

5. Since the land of the cross-objectors/claimants in the

present cross-objection is situated at village Neri and the said land was

acquired under the same Notification issued under Section 4(2)

published on 12.04.1999 and village Nababpur, Mahimapur, Roshanpur

and Neri are adjoining villages, the claimants would be entitled for

enhanced amount of compensation on the ground of parity. As the issue

involved in the present cross-objection is already decided by this Court

in the aforesaid cross-objection and since the land of the cross-objectors

herein being similarly situated, I do not find any reason to take a

different view in this cross-objection.

6. In this view of the matter, for the reasons as stated in the

judgment of this Court in Cross-Objection No.31 of 2018 in First Appeal

No.433 of 2014, cross-objectors/claimants herein are also entitled to

receive compensation for dry crop land Survey Nos.33 and 36

admeasuring 1.07 H.R. and 1.34 H.R., respectively, situated at Neri at

the rate of Rs.1,68,000/- with all statutory benefits and interest. Hence,

cross-objection filed by the claimants is allowed. Consequently, the

judgment and decree of the Reference Court is modified as under :

(i) The cross-objectors/legal representatives of original

claimant are entitled for enhanced compensation at the rate of

Rs.1,68,000/- per hectare for land Survey Nos.33 and 36

admeasuring 1.07 H.R. and 1.34 H.R., respectively situated at

Neri, Tahsil Arvi, District Wardha alongwith all statutory benefits.

(ii) Needless to mention, the amount of compensation

which was already deposited by the appellant/V.I.D.C., they are

entitled to deduct the same.

(iii) Appellant/V.I.D.C. to deposit enhanced amount of

compensation in terms of above order within a period of four

months and thereafter the claimants shall be entitled to withdraw

the same.

(iv) The cross-objectors shall not be entitled to claim

interest for 948 days delayed period for filing cross objection.

(v) The withdrawal of the enhanced amount of

compensation shall be subject to payment of deficit amount of

Court fee, if any.

(vi) The cross-objection stand disposed of with no order as

to costs.

JUDGE

Wagh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter