Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14580 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2021
1
968 Writ Petition 3920 of 2019.odt
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3920 OF 2019
. Kiran s/o Onkar Wani,
Age 59 years, Occu : Retired
As Lab Technician, from
Jalgaon Municipal Corporation
Hospital, resident of Plot No.7
Gut No. 63, Vidhut Colony,
Jalgaon. ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
1] The State of Maharashtra
Through its Secretary,
Urban Development Department
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2] The Commissioner,
Jalgaon Municipal Corporation,
Jalgaon.
3] The Chief Accountant,
Jalgaon Municipal Corporation,
Jalgaon. ... RESPONDENTS
...
Mr. Amol N. Kakade, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent No.1 / State.
Mr. Sachin Munde, h/f Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
...
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 06th October, 2021.
968 Writ Petition 3920 of 2019.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT: ( Per S. V. Gangapurwala, J. )
. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent,
taken up for final hearing.
2 In fact, the dispute between the parties was considered by
this Court in Writ Petition No.5674 of 2015. It is submitted that still
now the amount of recovery is claimed. The recovery of amount set
aside by this Court is also claimed. It is further stated that the juniors
to the petitioner are paid the salary in the pay scale of 9300-34800
and Grade Pay 4700. The petitioner be also paid the same
legitimately.
3 According to the learned counsel for respondent
Corporation, the petitioner's appointment in the year 1991-1992 was
not by following due process. It was a temporary appointment. The
petitioner's first appointment is as Coolie, the second appointment is
as Lab Assistant and thereafter, he was appointed as Pharmacist.
4 There is no proper denial from the respondent
Corporation that the juniors to the petitioner are paid the same pay
scale as the petitioner was paid earlier to refixation.
968 Writ Petition 3920 of 2019.odt
5 In Writ Petition No.5674 of 2015 under the judgment and
order dated 19th October, 2016 we had concluded that it will not be
open for the Corporation to contend that the petitioners are not
appointed by following the due procedure and they are entitled to
Grade Pay of 3200 only. We had observed that the juniors to the
petitioner are also paid proper pay-scale as per the Sixth Pay
Commission, which the petitioner is entitled to. We had directed
respondent No.3 Corporation to consider the petitioner to be properly
appointed and pass orders afresh pursuant to the show cause notice.
6 It appears that subsequently, the Commissioner,
Municipal Corporation, had considered the case of the petitioner and
had confirmed the order dated 18th May, 2012. He had further taken a
decision that the increments that were stopped from July 2015 shall
be restored to the petitioner and the difference would be paid in ten
installments from October 2017. In spite of the said order by the
Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jalgaon, the impugned orders
are passed.
7 In light of the aforesaid, the impugned order is quashed
and set aside.
968 Writ Petition 3920 of 2019.odt
8 The petitioner would be entitled for the revised pay scale
of 9300-34800 and Grade Pay 4700 as is paid to the juniors of the
petitioner as Pharmacist.
9 The gratuity and pensionary benefits shall be released
accordingly.
10 Rule is accordingly made absolute. No costs.
[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] nga
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!