Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7026 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2021
1/5 WP-528-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2021
Aabidali Kadarali Shaikh
(In Nashik Central Jail) ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
Mr. Advait M Sethna appointed advocate a/w. Mr. Raju Thakker Mr.
Tanay Nandot, Mr. Pranav Gohil for Petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Thakre, PP a/w. Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for Respondent-
State.
...
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE &
MANISH PITALE, JJ.
RESERVED ON: 29th APRIL, 2021.
PRONOUNCED ON: 4th MAY, 2021.
JUDGMENT [PER S.S. SHINDE, J.]:
. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard with the
consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition for the
following substantial relief:
a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the records and proceedings and on perusal thereof, quash and or set aside the Impugned Rejection Letter/Letter of Understanding dated 19th September, 2020;
b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an Order directing the Superintendent of Nasik
Bhagyawant Punde
2/5 WP-528-2021.doc
Road Central Prison, Nasik to release the Petitioner herein on Covid-19 Emergency Parole Leave for 45 days on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present facts and circumstances and oblige;
3. The Petitioner (Convict No. C-11680), is convicted for the
offences under Section 302 of IPC for life and fine of Rs. 5000/-, in
Sessions Case No. 865 of 2014 on 13.04.2018 by the Sessions
Court at Mumbai.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits
that the petitioner has undergone more than 6 years imprisonment
and he is lodged in the Nashik Road Central prison. It is submitted
that the application of the petitioner to release him on emergency
(Covid-19) parole was rejected on the ground that the Petitioner
herein was never released on parole/furlough, till date. Therefore,
learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that, merely
because the Petitioner was never released earlier is no ground to
reject his application for emergency (Covid-19) parole.
5. Learned PP appearing for Respondent-State submits that
the prayer of the petitioner to release him on emergency (Covid-19)
parole has rightly been turned down, relying upon the notification
dated 8th May 2020 issued by the Government of Maharashtra,
Bhagyawant Punde
3/5 WP-528-2021.doc
Home Department. It is submitted that the requisite official capacity
to accommodate the convicts in Nashik Central Prison is 3178
inmates. By end of March 2021, there were 2364 convicts (68-
women convicts and 2243 men convicts). It is submitted that in the
Nashik Central Prison 807 more convicts can be accommodated. In
order to prevent spread of Covid-19 virus, inmates/convicts who
have been recently lodged in the said prison are kept in isolation in
separate hall and after necessary health checkup and tests, they are
kept in the separate room in the prison. There is thermal scanning
and rapid antigen tests are conducted on regular basis. In case,
anybody is tested positive one separate isolation room No. 8 is
maintained for their stay and treatment.
6. We have given careful consideration to the submissions
of learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned PP
appearing for the Respondent-State. With the able assistance of
learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned PP, we
have perused the pleadings and grounds in the petition, annexures
thereto, impugned order/letter of understanding and also report
received from the Superintendent of Nashik Central Prison, Nashik.
Upon careful perusal of the said report received from the prison
authority, it clearly appears on record that the proper care is being
taken of the convicts in the prison, so as to, avoid possibility of
Bhagyawant Punde
4/5 WP-528-2021.doc
contracting Covid-19 virus. However, in the impugned order/letter
of understanding a reason given is that, the Petitioner herein was
never released on furlough/parole, in past.
7. In our opinion, merely because the petitioner was not
released earlier cannot be a ground for rejecting the application of
the petitioner for emergency parole. This Court in Criminal Writ
Petition-ASDB-LD-VC No. 65 of 2020 (Milind Ashok Patil & Ors. Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.) had occasion to consider similar issue
and a view is taken in the said case that merely because the
petitioner was not released twice in the past on parole/furlough
cannot be a ground for rejecting the application for emergency
parole.
8. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is partly
allowed. The impugned order dated 19.09.2020 passed by
Respondent-authority, is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is
granted liberty to apply afresh for grant of emergency Covid-19
parole within one week from today. Upon filing such an application,
the respondent authority shall decide the same on its own merits,
as expeditiously as possible, however, within two weeks from the
date of filing of the application in accordance with the Prisions
Bhagyawant Punde
5/5 WP-528-2021.doc
(Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and keeping in view the
factors like the extent of spread of Covid-19 virus and conditions in
jail.
9. Rule is partly made absolute to above extent. The writ
petition stands disposed of accordingly.
10. We appreciate the able assistance rendered by Advocate
Mr. Advait Sethna, appointed for representing the petitioner. We
quantify his fees at Rs. 5000/- to be paid by High Court Legal
Services Committee, Mumbai, within four weeks from the receipt of
copy of this order.
( MANISH PITALE, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Bhagyawant Punde
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!