Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohamed Salman Mohd. Sharif ... vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 7010 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7010 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2021

Bombay High Court
Mohamed Salman Mohd. Sharif ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                                23. IA 1305-21 in A 396-21.doc


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1305 OF 2021
                                                   IN
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 396 OF 2021


            1. Mohamed Salman Mohd.Sharif Shaikh
            2. Raghavendra Ramnivas Singh                         ...Applicants
                Versus
            The State of Maharashtra                              ...Respondent

            Mr. Aniket Vagal for the Applicants.

            Mr. S.V.Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.

                                            CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                            DATE : 3rd MAY, 2021
                                            (Through Video Conferencing)
            P.C. :


            1.             Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



            2.             By this application, the applicants seek suspension of their

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of

            their appeal.



            3.             The applicants alongwith other co-accused, vide judgment and

            order dated 19/03/2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

Wakodikar                                                                                         1/4



             ::: Uploaded on - 03/05/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 23:44:18 :::
                                                               23. IA 1305-21 in A 396-21.doc


            Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.712 of 2014, have been convicted

            and sentenced as under :-

                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 489-B of the Indian

                   Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay

                   fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default to undergo further rigorous

                   imprisonment for 1 year;

                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 489-C of the Indian

                   Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay

                   fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default, to undergo further rigorous

                   imprisonment for 6 months;


                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 489-E of the Indian

                   Penal Code, to pay fine of Rs.100/- each, in default, to undergo

                   further simple imprisonment for 3 days;

                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 120-B of the Indian

                   Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay

                   fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default to undergo further rigorous

                   imprisonment for 1 year;


                   The applicants were acquitted of the offence punishable under

                   Sections 15(1)(iii)(a) punishable under Section 16 of the Unlawful

                   Activities (Prevention) Act and Section 18 of the Unlawful Activities

Wakodikar                                                                                       2/4



             ::: Uploaded on - 03/05/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 23:44:18 :::
                                                                     23. IA 1305-21 in A 396-21.doc


                       (Prevention) Act.


                               All the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.


             4.                Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants

             have been in custody since June, 2014 for about 7 years. He submits that

             the applicants have already undergone 3/4th of the sentence. He submits

             that apart from the aforesaid offence, the applicants have no other

             antecedents. He submits that considering the fact that the applicants have

             undergone 3/4th of the sentence awarded by the Trial Court for the offences

             punishable under Sections 489-B, 489-C and 489-E of the Indian Penal

             Code, the applicants be enlarged on bail.



             5.                Having regard to what is stated aforesaid, that the applicants

             have undergone more than 3/4th of the sentence awarded to them, the

             applicants' sentence is suspended and they are enlarged on bail, pending the

             hearing and final disposal of their appeal, on the following terms and

             conditions :-

                                                    ORDER

i) The applicants be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in

the sum of Rs.20,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount;

Wakodikar                                                                                             3/4




                                                                      23. IA 1305-21 in A 396-21.doc




            ii)                 The applicants shall report to the trial Court, once in four

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till their appeal is

finally disposed of;

iii) The applicants shall keep the trial Court informed of their

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or

mobile details, if any, from time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court and the

prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation

of bail.

6. The application is accordingly disposed of.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                                              4/4




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter