Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Riwal Kakdya Kale vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 7003 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7003 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2021

Bombay High Court
Riwal Kakdya Kale vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 May, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                                24. IA 1315-21 in A 398-21.doc


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1315 OF 2021
                                                   IN
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 398 OF 2021

            Riwal Kakdya Kale                                     ...Applicant
                Versus
            The State of Maharashtra                              ...Respondent

            Mr. Wasim Samlewale for the Applicant.

            Mr. S.V.Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.

                                            CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                            DATE : 3rd MAY, 2021
                                            (Through Video Conferencing)
            P.C. :


            1.             Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



            2.             By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of

            his appeal.



            3.             The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 20/03/2021

            passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli in Sessions Case

            No.99 of 2016, has been convicted and sentenced as under :-

Wakodikar                                                                                         1/3



             ::: Uploaded on - 03/05/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 09/09/2021 23:44:22 :::
                                                                    24. IA 1315-21 in A 398-21.doc


                       -       for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian

                       Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay

                       fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo further simple imprisonment

                       for 1 month.


             4.                Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the grounds for

             convicting the applicant are not sustainable inasmuch as the applicant has

             not played any active role in the commission of the offence. He further

             submits that the applicant was only found standing near the Tata Sumo. He

             submits that there is no recovery at the instance of the applicant nor any

             Test Identification parade was held. He further submits that the applicant

             was on bail pending trial and that he has not abused or misused the liberty

             granted to him.



             5.                Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

             applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the

             hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and

             conditions :-

                                                   ORDER

i) The applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in

the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

Wakodikar                                                                                            2/3




                                                                      24. IA 1315-21 in A 398-21.doc




            ii)                 The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in four

months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is finally

disposed of;

iii) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or

mobile details, if any, from time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court and the

prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation

of bail.

6. The application is accordingly disposed of.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                                              3/3




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter