Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balasaheb @ Balaji Babasaheb ... vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 4687 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4687 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2021

Bombay High Court
Balasaheb @ Balaji Babasaheb ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 March, 2021
Bench: V. V. Kankanwadi
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                   28 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.623 OF 2021
                  IN APPEAL/118/2021 WITH APPEAL/118/2021


                    BALASAHEB @ BALAJI BABASAHEB JAGTAP
                                       VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                          ...
                      Mr. H.P. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant
                      Mr. A.V. Deshmukh, APP for the respondent
                                          ...

                                   CORAM :      SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
                                   DATE :       15th MARCH, 2021.


PER COURT :



1              Heard learned Advocate Mr. H.P. Jadhav for the applicant and

learned APP Mr. A.V. Deshmukh for the respondent.


2              Learned APP has strongly opposed the application for suspension

of sentence submitting that the well reasoned Judgment has been delivered

by the learned Trial Judge.


3              The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the

applicant was on bail throughout the trial. He has been falsely implicated.

Further, the informant, who was the Gramsevak, himself has turned hostile.



    ::: Uploaded on - 16/03/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2021 23:25:08 :::
                                            2                                 Cri.Appln_623_2021



Yet, the conviction has been awarded.           The applicant has merits in the

appeal.


4              It appears that apart from the present applicant there were two

more accused persons, against whom the FIR was lodged and the prosecution

was launched. They have been charged and tried for the offence punishable

under Section 353, 323, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 in Special (Atrocity) Case No.14/2014

decided by the learned Special Judge, under the Atrocities Act (Additional

Sessions Judge), Ambajogai, Dist. Beed on 26.02.2021. Only the present

applicant came to be convicted that too for Section 353 only. He has been

sentenced thus -


          "The Accused No.(1) Balasaheb @ Balaji s/o Babasaheb Jagtap is
          hereby held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 353 of the
          Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment of
          two months and a fine of Rs.5,000/-. In default of payment of fine
          amount, accused to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days."




5              It also appears from the impugned Judgment that the informant

himself has turned hostile. No doubt, the learned Trial Judge has relied upon

the decision by the Apex Court stating that hostility of a witness does not




    ::: Uploaded on - 16/03/2021                      ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2021 23:25:08 :::
                                          3                                Cri.Appln_623_2021



debar the Court from considering the other evidence on record. Under such

circumstance, whether other evidence is available or not is required to be

considered, and therefore, case is made out to suspend the sentence. Taking

into consideration that it is a small sentence, Kiran Kumar vs. State of M.P.,

(2001) 9 SCC 211, he deserves to be released on bail pending appeal.

Hence, following order.


                                     ORDER
1              The Criminal Application stands allowed.


2              The substantive sentence imposed on the applicant/appellant by

the learned Special Judge under the Atrocities Act (Additional Sessions

Judge), Ambajogai, Dist. Beed vide Judgment and order dated 26.02.2021 in

Special (Atrocity) Case No.14/2014, is hereby suspended till hearing and

final disposal of Criminal Appeal No.118 of 2021.

3 The applicant Balasaheb @ Balaji Babasaheb Jagtap be released

on P.R. of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with one surety in the

lime amount.

4 The applicant shall not commit any criminal activity.


5              The applicant shall remain present before the learned Trial Judge





                                             4                                Cri.Appln_623_2021



once in six months, till final hearing and disposal of the appeal, commencing

from the date he tenders bail papers and thereafter, the Trial Judge to fix

dates for his subsequent appearances.

6 In case of two consecutive defaults on the part of the applicant to

remain present before the Trial Court, the Trial Court to inform this Court

about the same and in that eventuality, the prosecution would be at liberty to

file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the applicant.

7                Bail before the Trial Court.




                                                 ( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )



agd





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter