Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramkrishna Tukaram Mahalle ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 7953 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7953 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Ramkrishna Tukaram Mahalle ... on 16 June, 2021
Bench: S. M. Modak
CAF 2090.19.                                                                                                   1/3


                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

          Civil Application (F) No.2090/2019 in First Appeal St No.26085/2018
            VIDC Executive Engineer, Akola V Ramkrishna Mahalle thr Lrs and others
*******************************************************************************************************************
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                               Court's or Judge's Orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
*******************************************************************************************************************

                 Mrs U.A. Patil, appellant.
                 Shri M.A. Kadu, AGP for resp. nos.2 and 3.
                 Shri P.R. Agrawal, Adv for resp. nos.1(A) to 1(I).

                 CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 16th JUNE, 2021.

Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned Counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2. Heard both the sides.

3. The Executive Engineer of VIDC was a party before the Reference Court. VIDC was not a party. They want to prefer an appeal along with the Executive Engineer. No doubt it is required. There is no need to issue notice to the respondents. Hence, VIDC is granted leave to prefer an appeal.

4. Copy of application be served on the respondents.

5. Application is disposed of.

Civil Application (F) No.3708/2019

Heard learned Advocate Mrs. Patil for the

CAF 2090.19. 2/3

appellant, learned Advocate Shri Agrawal for respondent nos. 1(A) to 1(I) and learned AGP Shri Kadu for respondent nos. 2 and 3.

2. There is a delay of 251 days in preferring an appeal. The delay is opposed on behalf of the contesting respondents. The delay is satisfactorily explained. They took time in completing the office procedure.

3. Hence, the delay of 251 days in preferring an appeal is condoned.

4. Application is disposed of.

Civil Application (F) No.3709/2019

Stay is granted to the execution of the impugned judgment and decree subject to deposit of entire decretal amount within the period of 10 weeks before this Court.

2. Application is disposed of.

3. The claimants are at liberty to ask for its withdrawal and it will be considered on merit.

First Appeal St. No.26085/2018

Issue notice before admission to the respondents.

2. Learned Advocate Shri Agrawal, waives notice for respondent nos. 1(A) to 1(I).

CAF 2090.19. 3/3

3. Learned AGP Shri Kadu, waives notice for respondent nos. 2 and 3.

4. Matter is kept on 22-06-2021 for hearing on the appeal as well as on withdrawal application.

Cross Objection (St.) No.2112/2021

Learned Advocate Shri Agrawal undertakes to remove the objections taken by the office in the cross objection.

2. Matter is kept on 22-06-2021.

JUDGE Deshmukh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter