Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9172 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021
31-wp2545-21.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2545 OF 2021
Arun A.Prabhudesai ...Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.V.S. Talkute for the Petitioner.
Mrs.P.J. Gavhane, AGP for the State - Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr.Rajendra Anbhule for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA &
R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 14TH JULY, 2021.
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
P.C. :-
1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, the petitioner seeks order and direction against the
respondent nos.1 and 2 to grant pension to the petitioner as
expeditiously as possible and further direction to pay to the petitioner
interest at the rate of 12% p.a. on the delayed payment of pension
from the date of retirement of the petitioner till realization along with
arrears.
2. This Court on 9th July, 2021 had recorded that the learned
AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 State seeks time to consider the
31-wp2545-21.doc
judgments annexed at pages 36 to 59 of the petition and to make a
statement before this Court whether the issue involved in this petition
is concluded in favour of the petitioner by these judgments or not.
Today learned AGP appearing for the respondent nos.1 and 2 makes
a statement on instruction that the issue arising in this petition is
concluded in favour of the petitioner by the judgments annexed at
pages 36 to 59 to the petition . Statement is accepted.
3. The judgments in Writ Petition Nos.6168 of 2012, 8830 of
2015, 1175 of 2018, 5068 of 2018 and other companion matters and
Writ Petition No.8830 of 2015 along with other companion matters
are on record of this petition.
4. We have also considered the order dated 25 th February,
2021 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition
No.2482 of 2020 Mrs.Kunda Prakash Ranade vs. State of
Maharashtra through its Secretary Higher & Technical Education
Department & Ors. along with other companion matters wherein this
Court has considered the various Division Bench decisions of this
Court which are referred to above and observed that that the
objections regarding over age at the time of appointment could not
be sustained for denying pension to the respective employees. It was
further observed that the AGP for the State is unable to point out any
distinguishing feature in the facts of that matter from the facts of
31-wp2545-21.doc
these other cases.
5. In view of the said decisions referred to above, we
observe that the petitioner's pension has been delayed due to no
fault of theirs and despite the law laid down by this Court in the
above referred cases. We direct the respondent no.3 Educational
Institution to forthwith comply with all the formalities relating to
release of the pension dues of the petitioner. The respondent no.3
Educational Institution shall submit the requisite papers if not already
submitted to the respondent State for releasing the pension dues.
The respondent no.3 Educational Institution shall offer all possible
assistance for completing the formalities.
6. Since the petitioner's pension has been delayed due to no
fault of theirs inspite the law laid down by this Court in the above
referred cases, the respondent nos.1 and 2 are directed to pay the
petitioner pension dues with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. on the
delayed payment of pension from the date of respective due dates
and until payment. We direct the respondent nos.1 and 2 State to
pass appropriate orders and release the pension dues as
expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six
weeks from the date of receipt of the papers from the respondent
nos.3 Educational Institution. If necessary documents are already
submitted, then the respondent nos.1 and 2 State shall pass
31-wp2545-21.doc
appropriate orders and release the pension dues within six weeks
from today. In case the the petitioner's dues are not released within
the above stated period, the pension dues shall carry interest at the
rate of 12% p.a. from the expiry of the above stated period and until
payment.
7. The petition is accordingly disposed of in above terms.
There shall be no order as to costs.
8. All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order
duly authenticated by the Sheristedar of this Court.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!