Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunil Bhagwat Pajai vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 9006 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9006 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 July, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sunil Bhagwat Pajai vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso ... on 9 July, 2021
Bench: V. G. Joshi
                                         1



               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.


                          CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2021


                   Sunil Bhagwat Pajai,
                   Aged about 30 years,
                   Occupation : Labour,
                   R/o Railway Station, Jalamb,
                   Tq. Shegaon, District Buldana
                                                              ... APPELLANT

                                       VERSUS

               1. State of Maharashtra, through
                  Police Station Officer,
                  Khamgaon, Buldana.

               2. Sau. Anusaya Digambar Kamble
                  aged about : 41 years,
                  Occupation : Nil,
                  R/o Near Railway Station, Jalamb,
                  Jalamb, Buldana

                                                             ... RESPONDENTS

   _____________________________________________________________
          Shri S.V. Sirpuarkar, Advocate with Mrs. R.S. Sirpurkar,
          Advocate for the Appellant.
          Shri I.J. Damle, A.P.P. for the respondent no. 1-State.
          Respondent no.2 is served.
   ______________________________________________________________

                               CORAM    : VINAY JOSHI, J.
                               DATED    : 09/07/2021








  ORAL JUDGMENT                :


ADMIT. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel

appearing for the respective parties.

2. By way of this appeal, the appellant is seeking for regular bail

in Crime No.50 of 2021 registered with Jalamb Police Station, District

Buldana for the offence punishable under Sections 354, 354-A of the

Indian Penal Code, Sections 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and

Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, 2012

(POCSO).

3. The Respondent no.1/State resisted bail by filing reply-

affidavit and contending that there is statement of eye-witness who has

seen the applicant running from that place soon-after the occurrence.

4. At the instance of report lodged by the mother of the victim-

girl aged 12 years, the crime was registered. It is alleged that on the

date of occurrence, the appellant accosted the victim-minor girl, caught

hold her hand, took her behind the dispensary and asked about love

relationship. The victim-minor girl gave jerk and ran away. The

allegations are restricted to outraging the modesty of a woman and

sexual assault, which are punishable with the imprisonment which may

extend up-to five years. Investigation is complete and charge-sheet has

been filed. There is no reason to detain the appellant/accused

furthermore at this pre-trial stage.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the appellant can

be released on bail by imposing certain conditions. In view of that,

following order is passed :

(i) The Criminal Appeal is allowed. The impugned order

dated 08.06.2021 passed by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge, Khamgaon in Special Case No.51 of

2021 is hereby quashed and set aside.

(ii) The Appellant/accused Sunil Bhagwat Pajai be released

on bail in connection with the Crime No.50 of 2021

registered with Jalamb Police Station, District Buldana

for the offence punishable under Sections 354, 354-A of

the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(va)

of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 8 of the

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, 2012

(POCSO) on his furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- with

one or two sureties in the like amount.

(iii) The Appellant/accused shall not directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case, as also shall not

tamper with the evidence.

(iv) The Appellant/accused shall not enter within the limits

of village Jalamb, till the conclusion of trial.

The Criminal Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE

Trupti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter