Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maha. Agrotech (India) Thr. Prop. ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 603 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 603 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Maha. Agrotech (India) Thr. Prop. ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 12 January, 2021
Bench: Z.A. Haq, Amit B. Borkar
                                        1                               cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 883 OF 2017
                                 WITH
               CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 10 OF 2018


 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 883 OF 2017

  1. Shri Santosh S/o. Ganpatrao Netam,
     Age about 33 years, Occ. Service,
     R/o. Ward No. 39, Gandhi Nagar,
     Rajnandgaon, Tah. & Dist. Rajnandgaon,
     (Chhattisgarh).


  2. Shri Shubham S/o. Vikasji Manusmare,
     Aged about 21 years, Occ. Service,
     R/o. Ward No. 2, Koparna,
     Tah. Koparna, Dist. Chandrapur.                                       . . . APPLICANTS

                       ...V E R S U S..

  1. State of Maharashtra through
     Police Station Officer,
     Warora, Dist. Chandrapur.

  2. Shri Madhukar S/o. Govindrao Sontakke,
     Aged about 52 years, Occ. Service,
     Office Address- District Quality Control
     Inspector, Agriculture Office,
     Chandrapur.                              . . . NON-APPLICANTS


 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Shri Rohit P. Masurkar, Advocate for applicants.
 Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non-applicant no. 1/State.
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                              WITH




::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021                                 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::
                                        2                              cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt



 CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 10 OF 2018

 Maha. Agrotech (India) through its
 Proprietor Sharad S/o. Nandkishore Mishra,
 Age about 41 years, Occ. Business,
 Office at Jagnaade Chowk, Main Road,
 Tah. Amgaon, Dist. Gondia.                                                 . . . APPLICANT

                ...V E R S U S..

 1. State of Maharashtra through
    Police Station Officer, Warora,
    Dist. Chandrapur.

 2. Shri Madhukar S/o. Govindrao Sontakke,
    Aged about 52 years, Occ. Service,
    Office Address- District Quality Control
    Inspector, Agriculture Office,
    Chandrapur                                                    . . . NON-APPLICANTS

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Shri Y. R. Kinkhede, Advocate a/w. Shri Rohit P. Masurkar, Advocate
 for applicant.
 Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non-applicant no. 1/State.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               CORAM :- Z. A. HAQ AND
                                        AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.

DATED :- 12.01.2021

JUDGMENT (PER : AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) :-

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of learned Advocate for the parties.

2. Since, both these applications challenge the same First

Information Report (FIR), the applications are decided by common

judgment.

                                  3                         cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt




 3.             The applicant/s by way present             applications        is/are

challenging the FIR bearing no. 515/2017, dated 10.05.2017

registered by the non-applicant no. 1-Police Station for the offence

punishable under Section 12, 13(I)(a), 7, 4, 5 and 35 of the Fertilizer

Control Order, 1955 and under Section 7(I)(a)(II) of the Essential

Commodities Act, 1957.

4. The FIR came to be registered against the applicant/s at the

instance of the non-applicant no. 2, with accusation that the

applicant/s supplied sub-standard seeds to the farmers by representing

it as best quality. It is alleged that manufacturing company and their

sales representatives without permission have manufactured and

distributed and sold fertilizers and also sold sub-standard seeds,

without issuing bills and without maintaining Sale Register and other

required documents for cheating farmers and have committed offence

alleged in the FIR.

5. The applicant/s therefore, challenged the FIR by filing the

present applications. This Court issued notices to the non-applicants.

This Court on 14.08.2008 granted stay to the further proceedings in

Crime No. 515/2017.

4 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt

6. The non-applicant no. 1 filed its reply and pointed out that

the applicant/s have cheated villagers by supplying sub-standard

fertilizers. It is also stated that laboratory report shows that the

fertilizers sold by the applicant/s contain ingredients, which are

banned in the State of Maharashtra. On 28.08.2018, the non-applicant

no. 2 filed reply and pointed out that though there was interim relief

granted on 29.01.1998 by this Court and continued on 29.06.2018, the

Investigating Officer inadvertently filed charge-sheet on 13.08.2018. It

is further submitted that the said Investigation Officer therefore,

tenders unconditional apology. It is therefore submitted that

proceeding initiated may kindly be dropped.

7. We have carefully considered the contents of the FIR and

replies filed by the non-applicant no. 1. The prosecution has not

pointed out any Order or Circular or Government Resolution or

Notification to show that the above mentioned product is fertilizer

within the meaning of the Fertilizer Control Order or it comes under

any other Control Order, which is issued under Section 3 of the

Essential Commodities Act. It is brought to our notice that

Government Resolution dated 16.08.2010 issued under the Fertilizer

Control Order, 1985 regarding constitution of committee for quality

control has been cancelled by the Government Resolution dated

03.10.2017.

5 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt

8. The prosecution is not able to bring on record any order or

notification to show that fertilizer, which is subject matter of the FIR,

has been mentioned as a banned product in the Fertilizer Control

Order, 1985 or any other order issued under Section 3 of the Essential

Commodities Act. Therefore, ingredients of offence punishable under

Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act are not made out.

Continuation of proceeding against the applicant/s would amount to

abuse of process of Court. We, therefore, pass the following order:

First Information Report bearing Crime No. 515/2017,

dated 10.05.2017 against the applicant/s by the non-applicant no. 1-

Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 12, 13(I)(a), 7,

4, 5 and 35 of the Fertilizers Control Order, 1955 and under Section

7(I)(a)(II) of Essential Commodities Act, 1957 against the applicant/s

are quashed and set aside.

Both the Criminal Applications are allowed in the above

terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

                JUDGE                                          JUDGE

 RR Jaiswal





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter