Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2006 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2021
1
W.P.14979-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 14979 OF 2019
Atharv Rajendra Koli .. Petitioner
Versus
Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
through its Member Secretary and ors. .. Respondents
Mr S.S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner
Mr P.S Patil, Addl.G.P. for respondent no.1
Mr M.N. Navandar, Advocate for respondent no.2
Mr B.B. Yenge, Advocate for respondent no.3 - absent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 30th January 2021
PER COURT :
1. The petitioner is challenging the letter cancelling the admission of the
petitioner on the ground that petitioner has not submitted the validity
certificate.
2. This Court, under order dated 11.12.2019 had directed the
respondents no.2 and 3 that if the petitioner is otherwise eligible, then they
shall not refrain the petitioner from appearing for the examination.
2. Learned A.G.P., on instructions submits that the petitioner was issued
notice along with the vigilance report for appearing on 9.8.2018. The
petitioner sent a letter that the matter be decided as per the convenience of
the Committee. The say to the vigilance report was also not filed.
3. The learned A.G.P. informs that the next date of hearing is 2.2.2021.
4. Mr Phatale, learned Counsel for the petitioner assures the Court that
the petitioner will remain present on the next date of hearing.
W.P.14979-2019
5. Mr Phatale submits that the examination of the petitioner of third year
is from 3.2.2021 till 15.2.2021. The petitioner would thereafter immediately
appear before the Committee and file his say and co-operate in expeditious
disposal of the proceeding.
6. We accept the said statement as an undertaking to the Court. In light
of that, we pass the following order:
7. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 18.2.2021. Within
seven days of appearing before the Committee, the petitioner shall file his
say to the vigilance report and the Committee shall thereafter decide the
proceeding within six weeks.
8. If the petitioner does not co-operate in hearing the matter, the
Committee shall proceed further.
9. The impugned letter cancelling the admission of the petitioner is
quashed and set aside.
10. The respondents no.2 and 3 may take further course of action
depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the Committee in
the validation proceeding.
11. Writ Petition disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!