Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pratik Sanosh Thombre Thr ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2003 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2003 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Pratik Sanosh Thombre Thr ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr ... on 30 January, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant Dattatray Kulkarni
                                        1
                                                                W.P.1341-2021

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 1341 OF 2021

1.      Pratik s/o Santosh Thombre
        Age 17 years, Occu.Education
        Minor under guardianship of
        his father Santosh Eknath Thombre
        Age 41 years, Occu. Service,
        R/o Shivajinagar, Taluka Nagar,
        District Ahmednagar

2.      Avantika d/o Machindra Thombre
        Age 17 years, Occu. Educatiion,
        Minor under guardianship of
        her father Machindra Gajanan Thombre,
        Age 46 years, Occu. Labourer,
        R/o Sale Tax Colony, Pipeline road,
        Savedi, Ahmedangar                                        ..Petitioners

                Versus

.       The State of Maharashtra and ors.                         ..Respondents

Mr D.D. Choudhari, Advocate for petitioners
Mr P.S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3
Mr M.D. Narwadkar, Advocate for respondent no.4


                                  CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                         SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 30th January 2021

PER COURT :

1. The present petitioners no.1 and 2 are paternal cousins. They had

applied for issuance of caste certificates as Koli Mahadev - Scheduled Tribe

and the same is invalidated.

2. Mr Choudhari, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the

real uncle of the petitioners Balkrushna is issued with the validity certificate.

The father of petitioner no.1 Santosh is also issued with the validity

certificate. The other paternal cousins namely Manjabapu, Akash, Shruti,

Vrushali, Gorakh, Vijay, Manisha, Aadi, Shivani and Sarla are issued with the

W.P.1341-2021

validity certificates of Koli Mahadev - Scheduled Tribe. The vigilance was

conducted before issuance of validity certificates to Shivani, Balkrushna and

others. The school entry of Gajanan Laxman Thombre of 9.9.1955 was

subject matter of consideration by the vigilance in validation proceeding of

Shivani. The vigilance found that in the school entry of Gajanan Laxman

Thombre, his caste is recorded as Hindu Mahadev Koli. The learned

Counsel relies on the judgment of this Court in case of Apoorva d/o Vinay

Nichale Vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and

others, reported in 2010 (6) Mh.L.J. 401.

3. Mr Patil, learned Addl.Government Pleader submits that the

petitioners did not bring it to the notice of the Committee that when the

petitioners had filed the proceedings for validation. The claim for validation

of their father was pending, so also that of other relatives. The said fact was

suppressed. While granting validity to the validity holders relied by the

petitioners, the contra entry in the school of Jagannath Laxman and

Chabubai Laxman were suppressed. The vigilance has also found that in

the school record of Gajanan Laxman, the entry is Hindu Koli and not

Mahadev Koli. The Committee has considered all these aspects and has

rightly negatived the claim of the petitioners. The petitioners have also failed

in the affinity test. The contra entries of Hindu Koli and Hindu Pan Koli in

the school record of the petitioners' cousin grandfather and cousin grand

aunt falsifies the case of the petitioners.

4. We have considered the submissions.

5. It is not a matter of dispute that the paternal relatives of the

petitioners, as referred to above are issued with the validity certificates of

Koli Mahadev - Scheduled Tribe. The vigilance is conducted before issuing

W.P.1341-2021

validity to many of them. In case of Shivani, the vigilance was conducted.

The school entry of Gajanan Laxman Thombre of 1955 was also subject

matter of consideration. The vigilance in the case of Shivani found school

entry in the school record of Gajanan Laxman Thombre of 1955, in the caste

column, caste is recorded as Hindu Mahadev Koli, whereas the vigilance in

the present case has found entry only to be Hindu Koli. There will be two

vigilance report contrary to each other.

6. Considering that the petitioners' father, real paternal uncle and many

other paternal relatives are issued with the validity certificates, after

conducting vigilance and many of the entries referred to above are also

subject matter of consideration, we pass the following order:

7. The Committee shall issue validity certificates to the petitioners of Koli

Mahadev - Scheduled Tribe immediately.

8. The said validity certificates would be subject to the decision that

would be taken by the Committee in the proceedings re-opened of the

validity holders relied by the petitioners.

9. Writ Petition disposed of. No costs.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

vvr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter