Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mangesh Gajanan Mahanawar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 1962 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1962 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Mangesh Gajanan Mahanawar vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 29 January, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                10A. IA (ST) 1656-21 in Appeal (ST) 1655-21.doc


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                         INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 1656 OF 2021
                                           IN
                           CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 1655 OF 2021

            Mangesh G. Mahanawar                                    ...Applicant
                 Versus
            State of Maharashtra                                    ...Respondent

            Ms. Neha Patil a/w Mr. Ganesh Chavan for the Applicant.

            Mr. A.R.Patil, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.


                                            CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                            DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2021
            P.C. :


            1.             By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal

            of the aforesaid appeal.



            2.             The applicant vide judgment and order dated 05/02/2020

            passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No.635 of

            2011 has been convicted and sentenced as under :

            - for the offence punishable under Section 363 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal

            Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of

            Rs.1000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days; and

Wakodikar                                                                                           1/3



             ::: Uploaded on - 29/01/2021                      ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 05:41:34 :::
                                                  10A. IA (ST) 1656-21 in Appeal (ST) 1655-21.doc


            - for the offence punishable under Section 366 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal

            Code, to suffer simple imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of

            Rs.1000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.



            3.             The applicant's appeal has been admitted today by a separate

            order passed in the aforesaid appeal. It is not in dispute that the applicant

            was on bail pending trial and post his conviction, his sentence has been

            suspended, enable him to file an appeal. The sentence imposed is a short

            term sentences. It is not in dispute that the applicant has not abused or

            misused the liberty granted to him and the appeal is not likely to come up

            for hearing in the immediate near future.



            4.                Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

            applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the

            hearing and final disposal of his Appeal, on the following terms and

            conditions :-

                                                  ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R.

Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only)

with one or two local sureties in the like amount;

                    ii)             The Applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in

Wakodikar                                                                                            2/3




10A. IA (ST) 1656-21 in Appeal (ST) 1655-21.doc

three months on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his

Appeal is finally disposed of;

iii) The Applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of

his current address and mobile contact number and/or change of

residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time;

iv) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing

before the trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the

High Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file an

application seeking cancellation of bail.

5. The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is

accordingly disposed of.

6. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                                            3/3




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter