Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sau. Vidhya W/O Swapnil Mohurle vs Swapnil S/O Mahadeo Mohurle
2021 Latest Caselaw 1947 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1947 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sau. Vidhya W/O Swapnil Mohurle vs Swapnil S/O Mahadeo Mohurle on 29 January, 2021
Bench: Swapna Joshi
                                        1        27.MCA. NO. 1235-2019 JUDGMENT.odt




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

    MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1235 OF 2019

        Sau. Vidhya W/o Swapnil Mohurle,
        Aged about 27 years,
        Occ. Household,
        R/o. Kothari, Tah. Ballarpur,
        District Chandrapur.                             .. APPLICANT

               ...Versus...

        Swapnil S/o Mahadeorao Mohurle,
        Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business,
        R/o. Sahara Nagar, Ner (Parsopant),
        Tq. Ner, District Yavatmal.         ..NON-APPLICANT

 -----------------------------------------------
 Ms. Kanak Y. Mandpe, Advocate for the Applicant.
 Shri Anand S. Deshpande, Advocate for the Non-applicant.
 -----------------------------------------------

                               CORAM : MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.
                               DATED   : 29th January, 2021.

  ORAL JUDGMENT :-



                   Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard

 finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the

 respective parties.




::: Uploaded on - 01/02/2021                      ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 06:19:44 :::
                                          2          27.MCA. NO. 1235-2019 JUDGMENT.odt




 2.                By     this   Application,     the      applicant/wife           seeks

 transfer of H.M.P. No. 286/2019 instituted by the non-

 applicant/husband, pending on the file of Civil Judge, Senior

 Division, Yavatmal to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division,

 Chandrapur.


 3.                The applicant/wife is a legally wedded wife of the

 non-applicant/husband. The marriage was solmenized on

 24.06.2013 at Village Kothari, Taluka Ballarpur, District

 Chandrapur. After the marriage, the applicant started cohabiting

 with the non-applicant/husband at Ner, District Yavatmal in a

 joint family. It is submitted that due to illtreatment at the hands

 of     the      non-applicant/husband,           the       applicant/wife            was

 constrained to leave the house of the non-applicant/husband.


 4.                The applicant/wife has filed a complaint under

 Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the

 Judicial       Magistrate       First   Class,    Ballarpur          for     grant      of

 maintenance. The same was rejected by the learned Judicial

 Magistrate, Ballarpur, and therefore, an appeal came to be

 preferred against the said order, which is pending in the Court

 of District and Sessions Judge, Chandrapur.



::: Uploaded on - 01/02/2021                            ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 06:19:44 :::
                                      3         27.MCA. NO. 1235-2019 JUDGMENT.odt




 5.                It is submitted that the applicant/wife is a poor lady

 having 5 years old son and at present she is residing with her

 parents at Village Kothari, Taluka Ballarpur, District Chandrapur.

 It is contended that it is difficult for her to attend the

 proceedings at Yavatmal.


 6.                Ms. Mandpe, the learned counsel for the applicant/

 wife submitted that it is very difficult for the applicant/wife to

 attend the Court at Yavatmal, therefore, the petition filed by the

 non-applicant/husband be transferred from Civil Judge, Senior

 Division, Yavatmal to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division,

 Chandrapur.


 7.                Shri Deshpande, the learned counsel for the non-

 applicant/husband has vociferously opposed the Application.


 8.                The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumita Singh

 vs. Kumar Sanjay and another, reported in AIR 2002 SC 396 has

 observed that the wife's convenience must be considered in

 matrimonial proceedings, particularly when the husband has

 filed the petition against her.


 9.                Considering the aforesaid circumstances, it would be



::: Uploaded on - 01/02/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 06:19:44 :::
                                        4          27.MCA. NO. 1235-2019 JUDGMENT.odt




     just and proper to transfer H.M.P. No. 286/2019 pending on the

     file of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal to the Court of

     Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur.


                                     ORDER

1. Misc. Civil Application No. 1235/2019 is allowed.

2. The proceedings bearing H.M.P. No. 286/2019 pending on the file of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal are transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur.

3. Parties to appear before the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur on 16/02/2021.

10. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. There

shall be no order as to costs.

( MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.) S.D.Bhimte

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter