Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1856 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021
1 962.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
962 WRIT PETITION NO.1650 OF 2021
BANSI RATAN SONWANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTEHRS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1651 OF 2021
SARALA W/O KAILASH BHASKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1652 OF 2021
BHAVSING S/O LALSING PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1653 OF 2021
MOHAN S/O WAMAN PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1654 OF 2021
GOPAL S/O NINAJI INGALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1655 OF 2021
ISHWAR S/O BAJIRAO PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
::: Uploaded on - 10/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 25/08/2021 00:57:59 :::
2 962.odt
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 7221 OF 2020
AKHTARSHA DAGASHA FAKIR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 6031 OF 2020
KAILASH S/O AMARSING BORSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioners : Shri Prafullasing H. Patil
AGP for the Respondents- State : Mrs.V. S. Chaudhari
...
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2021
...
ORAL ORDER :
1. We have heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and
learned A.G.P.
2. The objection of the learned A.G.P. of alternate remedy was
considered by this Court while delivering the judgment in Writ
Petition No.2344 of 2019 dated 19.3.2019.
3 962.odt
3. On merits, it is accepted by the learned Counsel for the
petitioners and learned A.G.P. that the petitioners stand on the
same premise as the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 2344 of 2019
and Writ Petition no.10752 of 2019 with connected Writ Petitions.
4. In the light of that and for the reasons recorded in the
judgment in Writ Petition No. 2344 of 2019 and Writ Petition
No.2345 of 2019 dated 19.3.2019, we follow the same course.
5. In the light referred to above, the Division Bench of this Court
had allowed the Writ Petitions and directed to refund the amount
along with the interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The Division
Bench of this Court in the said writ petitions passed the following
order :
"In that view of the matter, all these writ petitions stand allowed. The excess amount, which is deducted from the amount of retirement dues payable to the petitioners in the form of gratuity, be refunded to the respective petitioners along with interest @ 10% a.m. from the date the amount was recovered. The said refund be made within a period of six months."
6. In the light of above, the present Writ Petitions are also
disposed of in terms of the order passed in Writ Petition Nos. 2344
4 962.odt
and 2345 of 2019 dated 19.3.2019.
7. The respondents shall refund to the respective petitioners the
excess amount deducted from the amount of gratuity/salary along
with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date the
amount was recovered. The payment shall be made within a period
of six months.
8. These Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
shp/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!