Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalpna W/O Vitthal Wagh And 4 ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Jaulka ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1753 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1753 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Kalpna W/O Vitthal Wagh And 4 ... vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Jaulka ... on 27 January, 2021
Bench: Z.A. Haq, Amit B. Borkar
                                                    1               9-J-APL-138-21.odt

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                     NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

             CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.138 OF 2021

 APPLICANTS:                   1.             Sau. Kalpna W/o Vitthal Wagh,
 Ori.Complainant :                            Aged about : 21 years,
                                              Occu. : Household.

 Victim :                      2.             Vitthal s/o Tatyarao Wagh,
                                              Aged about : 26 years,
                                              Occu. : Agri.

 Accused :                     3.             Pramod s/o Kisan Khade,
                                              Aged about : 31 years,
                                              Occu. Agri.

 Accused :                     4.             Ravi s/o Pandurang @ Pandu
                                              Khade, Aged about : 21 years,
                                              Occu. Education.

 Accused :                     5.             Rama @ Rameshwar S/o
                                              Murlidhar Khade,
                                              Aged about : 21 years,
                                              Occu. Education.

                                              All R/o Karli Tq. Distt. Washim.
                                              Mob - 7620063143

                               VERSUS

 NON-APPLICANT :                               State of Maharashtra,
                                               Through Police Station Officer,
                                               Jaulka, Tq. Malegaon,
                                               Dist. Washim.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Shri R. L. Kadu, Advocate for applicants.
 Ms. Mayuri Deshmukh, Additional Public Prosecutor for Non-
 applicant-State.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                CORAM: Z.A. HAQ & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
                                DATED : 27/01/2021.




::: Uploaded on - 02/02/2021                               ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 00:36:58 :::
                                              2             9-J-APL-138-21.odt

 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER : AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)


 1.                   Heard.


 2.                   Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.


 3.                   This is an application jointly filed by the Informant,

 Victim and the accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

 Procedure challenging First Information Report No.11/2021

 registered with the non-applicant No.1 - Police Station for the

 offences punishable under Sections 323, 354, 294 and 506 r/w

 Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.



 4.                   The First Information Report came to be registered

 against the applicant Nos.3 to 5 with the accusation that the

 applicant Nos.3 to 5 assaulted the applicant No.2 and offended the

 modesty of the applicant No.1. During pendency of the

 investigation, the applicants have amicably resolved their dispute

 and they have, therefore, approached this Court by way of present

 application for quashing of the First Information Report.


 5.                   It appears that on the same day, counter First

 Information Reports were registered against the applicant Nos.3




::: Uploaded on - 02/02/2021                       ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 00:36:58 :::
                                            3            9-J-APL-138-21.odt

 to 5. Insofar as the impugned First Information Report is

 concerned, it has been registered at the instance of the applicant

 No.1. In the counter First Information Reports, the applicants -

 accused in the said First Information Report have filed Criminal

 Application (APL) No.134/2021 challenging registration of

 counter First Information Report against them. Both the

 applications are listed before this Court. Since the parties to both

 the First Information Reports have amicably settled their dispute,

 this     Court      already   allowed   Criminal    Application        (APL)

 No.134/2021 by setting aside registration of First Information

 Report No.9/2021. The impugned First Information Report

 No.11/2021 has been registered at the instance of the applicant

 No.1 and the applicant No.2 is the Victim. From the averments in

 the application, it is stated that the parties have amicably settled

 their dispute and the First Information Report came to be filed out

 of the misunderstanding. Since the applicants are residing in one

 village and to maintain their cordial relations, they have decided

 to settle their dispute.



 6.                   After carefully considering the First Information

 Report, we are satisfied that the allegations in the FIR are personal

 in nature. In view of the settlement of dispute between the parties,




::: Uploaded on - 02/02/2021                    ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 00:36:58 :::
                                             4             9-J-APL-138-21.odt

 chances of conviction are bleak. No purpose would be served by

 continuing the criminal proceedings against the applicant Nos.3 to

 5. In view of judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

 Madan Mohan Abbot Vrs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4

 SCC 582, we are satisfied that the First Information Report

 deserves to be quashed and set aside.



 7.                   We, therefore, pass the following order :-

                                    ORDER

The First Information Report No.11/2021

registered with the non-applicant No.1 - Police

Station for the offences punishable under Sections

323, 354, 294 and 506 r/w Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code is quashed and set aside.

8. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

                      JUDGE                        JUDGE

 Choulwar





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter