Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishwambhar S/O Prabhakar Sonone vs Manoj Shyamsundar Lohiya
2021 Latest Caselaw 1523 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1523 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vishwambhar S/O Prabhakar Sonone vs Manoj Shyamsundar Lohiya on 22 January, 2021
Bench: V.M. Deshpande
                                        1                                  220121appr120.20.odt


                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPR] NO. 120 OF 2020
                                    IN
               CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2020
                          VISHWAMBHAR S/o PRABHAKAR SONONE
                                       VERSUS
                              MANOJ SHYAMSUNDAR LOHIYA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of                           Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Mr. Mahendra Roy, Advocate h/f Mr. M. P. Kariya, Advocate for the
                        applicant.
                        Mr. A. A. Dhawas, Advocate for the non-applicant.

                                 CORAM : V. M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : JANUARY 22, 2021.

1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing revision application.

2. Office note shows that the notice issued on this application is awaited. However, Shri A.A. Dhawas, learned counsel appears and submits that he has instructions to appear for non-applicant - Manoj Shyamsundar Lohiya and he makes a statement that yesterday only he has filed the Vakalatnama on behalf of the non-applicant.

His statement is accepted.

3. In that view of the matter, service to the non- applicant is complete.

4. There is a delay of 237 days in filing the revision application.

5. Heard Shri Mahendra Roy, learned counsel holding for Shri M.P. Kariya, learned counsel for the applicant on the application for condonation of delay. Shri A.A. Dhawas learned counsel for non-applicant graciously submits that he has no objection for allowing this 2 220121appr120.20.odt

application since the matter can be contested on its own merits. The stand taken by the learned counsel for the non-applicant is appreciated.

6. The criminal application is allowed. Delay in filing the revision application is condoned. The application is disposed of.

Criminal Application (APPR) NO. 122 of 2020

1. Heard Shri Mahendra Roy, learned counsel holding for Shri M. P. Kariya, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri A. A. Dawas, learned counsel for the non- applicant.

2. The applicant is the accused, whereas the non- applicant is the complainant, who filed proceedings in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mehekar under the provisions of the Negotiable Instructions Act. The applicant was convicted by the learned J.M.F.C, Mehkar in Summary Criminal Case No. 848/2006 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide judgment dated 06.09.2010. The applicant was directed to suffer simple imprisonment for two months and to pay a fine of Rs.40,000/-. Out of the said fine amount of Rs.40,000/-, an amount of Rs.35,000/- was directed to be paid to the non-applicant/complainant.

3. Felt aggrieved thereby, the applicant approached to the learned Sessions Judge, Buldhana by filing an appeal. It was registered as Criminal Appeal No. 01/2019 and the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehekar vide judgment dated 07.12.2019 dismissed the appeal. The learned Additional Sessions Judge directed the applicant to appear before the trial Court within a period of one month from the date of judgment.

3 220121appr120.20.odt

4. The applicant approached to this Court by filing this revision. Since, the revision was barred by limitation, he filed an application for condonation of delay and the present application for suspension of substantive jail sentence and for grant of bail along with the revision application. On 27.11.2020, this application came up for consideration before this Court (Coram : Manish Pitale, J.). On the said day, the learned counsel for the applicant made a statement before the Court that the applicant has already deposited Rs.20,000/- in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Mehekar. This Court thereafter directed the applicant to deposit balance Rs.20,000/- within a period of six weeks and subject to deposit of the balance amount, the substantive sentence was suspended.

5. Today, Mr. Roy, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that as per the directions given by this Court on 27.11.2020, the applicant has deposited balance amount of Rs.20,000/- in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mehkar and he tenders a pursis dated 21.01.2021 along with a photo copy of the receipt. The pursis along with a photo copy of the receipt is taken on record and it is marked as "Exhibit-X" for the purposes of identification. Even Shri Dhawas, learned counsel for the complainant states that in pursuance to the order dated 27.11.2020, the applicant has deposited the amount.

6. In view of the fact that the applicant has already complied with the condition and he is already on bail, this application is allowed.

7. The substantive jail sentence imposed on the applicant by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mehkar in Summary Criminal Case No. 848/2006 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide 4 220121appr120.20.odt

judgment dated 06.09.2010, shall remain suspended during pendency of this revision application.

8. Applicant - Vishwambhar Prabhakar Sonone shall execute fresh bond of Rs.10,000/- before the learned trial Court within a period of two weeks from today.

9. With this, APPR No.122/2020 is disposed of.

Cri. Revision Application No. 121 of 2020.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Looking to the amount for which the cheque in question was given by the applicant, the learned counsel for the complainant/non-applicant Mr. Dhawas states that the matter can be sent for mediation. Mr. Roy, learned counsel for the applicant also submits the same.

3. In that view of the matter, Registrar (Judicial) is directed to appoint a Mediator from the panel of Mediators to mediate the matter.

4. The parties agreed that they will appear before the learned Mediator on 08.02.2021 at 2.00 p.m. in the Mediation Centre of this Court.

5. The learned Mediator so appointed is requested to file the mediation report within a period of three weeks from first appearance.



                                           JUDGE
Diwale

                                                          Digitally signed
                                                          by Parag
                                             Parag        Diwale

                                             Diwale       Date:
                                                          2021.01.22
                                                          17:36:28 +0530
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter