Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1253 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021
917
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
917 WRIT PETITION NO.944 OF 2021
RAMESHWAR UTTAMRAO TEKLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Phatale Sagar S
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P. S. Patil
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 19th January, 2021
ORDER:
1. Learned Addl.G.P. accepts notice for all the respondents.
2. According to the petitioner, though the validation proceedings are
pending and this Court,under order dated 8 th September,2020 in Writ
Petition No. 6062 of 2020, had restrained the employer from taking
adverse action only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending,
still the employer has placed the petitioner on supernumerary post on
second time.
3. We have also heard Mr. Patil, the learned Additional Government
Pleader.
4. Initially, when the petitioner was placed on supernumerary post,
we had set aside the said order pursuant to our order dated 13.01.2021 in
Writ Petition No. 663/2020. Thereafter, the employer had issued notice to
the petitioner directing the petitioner to submit validity certificate or else,
adverse action would be taken. The said order was set aside by this Court
under order dated 8th September, 2020 in Writ Petition No. 6062 of 2020.
In the order dated 8th September, 2020 in Writ Petition No. 6062 of 2020,
we had observed as under:
"6. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The employer shall not take adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that the validation proceeding is pending. The employer any take further course of action depending upon the judgment that would be delivered on the validation proceeding of the petitioner."
5. Now, again, under the impugned resolution dated 31 st
December, 2020, the petitioner is placed under supernumerary post. The
respondents ought not to have passed the impugned order against the
petitioner. Inasmuch as the Scrutiny Committee has not decided the
validation proceedings and the petitioner was protected till the validation
proceedings are decided, under order dated 8 th September,2020 in Writ
Petition No. 6062 of 2020.
6. Mr. Yeramwar, the learned counsel submits that the petitioner was
present before the Committee twice for hearing.
7. Considering the above, as our order dated 8 th September,2020 in
Writ Petition No. 6062 of 2020 in favour of the petitioner is still in force
and the validation proceedings are pending, we set aside the impugned
resolution qua the petitioner.
8. The employer shall abide by the order dated 8 th September,2020
in Writ Petition No. 6062 of 2020.
9. Writ petition disposed of. No costs.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!