Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bapu Yeshwant Hire vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 2991 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2991 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Bapu Yeshwant Hire vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 15 February, 2021
Bench: S. K. Shinde
                                                                            25-IA-1401-
           Digitally                           2020.odt
           signed by
           Shambhavi
Shambhavi N. Shivgan
N. Shivgan Date:
           2021.02.15
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           17:25:10
           +0530
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1401 OF 2020
                                                    IN
                                     CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.473 OF 2020

                        Bapu Yeshwant Hire                     ... Applicant
                             Vs
                        The State of Maharashtra & Anr.       ... Respondents
                                                  ...

Mr. Sandeep Waghmare i/by Mr. Rahul Motkari for the Applicant.

Mr. Yogesh Dabke, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2021.

P.C. :

Heard.

2 Pending appeal, applicant seeks suspension of

sentence passed in Sessions Case No.24 of 2014 imposed

by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad.



                        3             Applicant-accused has been   convicted      under


                        Shivgan                                                     1/6
                                                 25-IA-1401-
                  2020.odt

Section 354-A, 354-D, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860 and Section 8 of the Protection of Children From

Sexual Ofences Act, 2012. For the ofence under Section

354-A read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, he has been

sentenced to sufer rigorous imprisonment for three months

; for the ofence punishable under Section 354-D, he has

been sentenced to sufer rigorous imprisonment for three

years and fne of Rs.3,000/-; for the ofence punishable

under Section 323, he has been sentenced to sufer

rigorous imprisonment for one year and fne of Rs.1,000/-

and for an ofence punishable under Section 506 of the IPC,

he has been sentenced to sufer rigorous imprisonment for

three years and fne of Rs.3,000/-.

4 Clause (7) of the operative order shows that the

accused was under detention from 24th March, 2014 to 21st

April, 2014 and from 7th December, 2019 till 31st January,

2020, a date on which he has been convicted and

sentenced. Sentence imposed is "short term" sentence.

Shivgan                                                 2/6
                                                       25-IA-1401-
                      2020.odt

Applicant has undergone sentence, say about more than a

year and a month. Moreover, appeal is not likely to be

heard in reasonable time.

5 I have perused the evidence and the impugned

judgment and order.

6 In view of the evidence and the sentence being

short term sentence, impugned sentence is suspended and

the applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or more sureties

in the like amount.

7 The application is accordingly allowed and

disposed of.

Shivgan                                                       3/6
                                                  25-IA-1401-
                  2020.odt




8         It is clarifed that his suspension of sentence and

the order releasing him on bail is subject to deposit of fne

imposed by the learned Sessions Court in the impugned

judgment and order.



                               (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)




Shivgan                                                  4/6
                                                    25-IA-1401-
                    2020.odt




IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.473 OF 2020

Bapu Yeshwant Hire ... Appellant Vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents ...

Mr. Sandeep Waghmare i/by Mr. Rahul Motkari for the Appellant.

Mr. Yogesh Dabke, APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2021.

P.C. :

Admit.

2 Call records and proceedings from the trial Court.

3 Mr. Dabke, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

waives notice for the respondent no.1-State. Issue notice to

the respondent no.2, returnable after eight weeks.

                                  (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)



Shivgan                                                    5/6
                      25-IA-1401-
          2020.odt




Shivgan                      6/6
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter