Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2210 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021
3. as wp 9300-19.doc
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9300 OF 2019
Sanghvi Movers Ltd .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
...................
Mr. Vinayak Patkar a/w Mr. Ishaan Patkar and Ms. Riya Jain i/by
Mr. Jindagi Shah for the Petitioner
Ms. Shruti Vyas, 'B' Panel Counsel for the State
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Patkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Ms. Shruti Vyas, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the
assessment order dated 02.04.2019 passed by respondent
No. 2 assessing the petitioner under section 9(2) of the
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with section 32(5) of the
Maharashtra Value Added Tax, 2002 for the assessment
period 2012-13 and thereafter levying tax, interest and
penalty on such count.
1 of 3
3. as wp 9300-19.doc
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is a dealer providing cranes on hire. Providing of
cranes for hire has been held to be service under the Finance
Act, 1994 and on such basis petitioner has been paying
service tax as levied. This aspect has been conclusively
dealt with by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Pune
Bench (briefly "the Tribunal" hereinafter) in Second Appeal
Nos. 376 and 377/2017 in the case of the petitioner itself for
the period 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009. By the judgment and
order dated 25.09.2020, Tribunal while allowing the appeals
and setting aside the assessment orders as well as orders of
the first appellate authority held that value added tax (VAT)
and central sales tax (CST) levied by treating the
transactions as transfer of right to use the goods i.e cranes is
not justified and hence deleted. Instead of following the
order passed by the Tribunal, fresh assessment order has
been passed again levying tax, interest and penalty under
the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 read with the Maharashtra
Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
4. In that view of the matter, learned counsel submits that
when the issue has been conclusively decided by the
Tribunal, it would be a futile exercise to approach the
2 of 3
3. as wp 9300-19.doc
appellate forum or avail the appellate remedy as provided
under the statute.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on
due consideration, we direct as an interim measure that
there shall be stay of the impugned order dated 02.04.2019
(Exh E to the writ petition).
6. Stand over to 26.03.2021.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signed Ravindra by Ravindra M.
Amberkar
M. Date:
Amberkar 2021.02.06
09:46:50 +0530
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!