Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17778 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021
pps 7 and 8 (ii) ia 3129 and 3133 of 21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NOI. 3129 OF 2021
IN
APPEAL NO. 1035 OF 2021
Vasant Manaji Parkhe ..Applicant
v/s.
Central Bureau of Investigation
& Anr. ..Respondent/s
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3133 OF 2021
IN
APPEAL NO. 1036 OF 2021
Sunil B. Jadhav s/o. Bhujangrao Jadhav ..Applicant
v/s.
Central Bureau of Investigation
& Anr. ..Respondent/s
Mr. Pravin D. Patel for the Appellants/Applicants .
Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the Respondent No.1/CBI.
Mr. P.H.Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.
DATED : 21st DECEMBER, 2021.
P.C.
1. The Applicants herein have filed these Applications under
Section 389 Cr. P.C. for suspension of sentence imposed by
judgment dated 22.11.2021 in CBI Special Case No. 28 of 2005, Digitally signed by PRASANNA P PRASANNA P SALGAONKAR SALGAONKAR Date:
Gr.Mumbai. By the impugned judgment the Applicants, who were 2021.12.21 15:13:54 +0530
1 of 4 pps 7 and 8 (ii) ia 3129 and 3133 of 21.doc
accused Nos.3 and 4 have been held guilty of offences under
Section 13(1)(d) r/w. 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and
have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one
year and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each i.d. to suffer simple
imprisonment for 3 months.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicants and the learned
APP for the State. Perused the records and considered the
submissions advanced by the learned Counsels for the respective
parties.
3. The Appeals are admitted. The records reveal that the
Applicants have been sentenced to undergo short term
imprisonment of One year. The Appeals are of the year 2021 and
are not likely to come up for final hearing in the next couple of
years due to large pendency of old cases, and the current situation
arising from COVID 19 pandcemic. Hence, rejection of the
applications will result in the Applicants undergoing the sentence
of imprisonment even before the Appeals are heard on merit.
2 of 4 pps 7 and 8 (ii) ia 3129 and 3133 of 21.doc
4. The Applicants were on bail during pendency of the trial.
There is nothing on record to indicate that the Applicants have
violated the terms and conditions of the order. Hence, in my
considered view, this is a fit case to suspend the sentence pending
the disposal of the Appeals on merit. Hence the Applications are
allowed on the following terms and conditions:-
i) Sentence imposed against the Applicant Nos.3 and 4 by
judgment dated 22.11.2021 in CBI Special Case No. 28 of 2005,
Gr.Mumbai is suspended pending hearing of the Appeals;
ii) The Applicants are ordered to be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Thousand Only) each with one or two solvent sureties in the like
amount, to the satisfaction of the Trial Court;
iii) The Applicants shall deposit 50% of the fine amount before
the trial Court within three weeks;
Iv) The Applicants shall report to the Trial Court once in two
months on the day/ date specified by the Trial Court, till the
3 of 4 pps 7 and 8 (ii) ia 3129 and 3133 of 21.doc
Appeals are finally disposed of;
v) The Applicants shall keep the trial Court informed of their
current address and mobile/contact numbers and/or change of
residence or mobile details, if any, from time to time.
vi) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the
trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High
Court and the prosecution would be at liberty to file application
seeking cancellation of bail.
. Both Applications are accordingly disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!