Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sailesh Sreeramulu And Anr vs Vistra Itcl (India) Ltd., And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 17397 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17397 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sailesh Sreeramulu And Anr vs Vistra Itcl (India) Ltd., And Ors on 14 December, 2021
Bench: S. K. Shinde
                                                       41-WP-595-2019.odt



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   WRIT PETITION NO.595 OF 2019

Sailesh Sreeramulu and Anr.                         ...Petitioners
      Vs
Vistara ITCL (INDIA) Ltd.,
and Ors.                                           ... Respondents

                                    ...

E.A.Sasi for the Petitioners.

Mr. Rajesh Kanojia i/by Res Juris for R.No.1. Mr. A.R. Patil , APP for the Respondent-State.

CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.

DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2021.

P.C. :

The Apex Court in the case of G.J.Raja v. Tejraj

Surana in Criminal Appeal No.1160 of 2019 has held in

paragraph 24 thus;

"24 In the ultimate analysis, we hold Section 143A to be prospective in operation and that the provisions of said Section 143A can be applied or invoked only in cases where the offence Under Section 138 of the Act was committed after the introduction of said Section

Shivgan 1/2

41-WP-595-2019.odt

143A in the statute book. Consequently, the orders passed by the Trial Court as well as the High Court are required to be set aside. The money deposited by the Appellant, pursuant to the interim direction passed by this Court, shall be returned to the Appellant along with interest accrued thereon within two weeks from the date of this order."

2 The ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment

squarely applies to the facts of this case. In this case,

offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act, 1881 was committed before the introduction of Section

143A in the statute book. In that view of the matter, order

dated 27th November, 2018 passed by the learned

Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier in

Complaint No.4426 of 2017 is quashed and set aside.

3 Writ Petition is allowed and disposed of in the

aforesaid terms.

                                             (SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.)



Shivgan                                                                              2/2




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter