Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17175 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2021
967-FA-823-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 823 OF 2015
Chhayabai Prakash Shelke and Others ..APPELLANTS
VERSUS
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Through Branch Manager, Parbhani
and Another ..RESPONDENTS
....
Mr. S.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for appellants
Mr. S.S. Rathi, Advocate for respondent no.1
....
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.
DATED : 09th DECEMBER, 2021
PER COURT :
1. Heard. This is an appeal for enhancement of compensation
granted on account of death in vehicular accident.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants - claimants would submit that
the deceased was a professional rickshaw driver. His monthly income was
not less than Rs.6,000/-. He was repaying Rs.4,000/- per month as loan
installment. He would further submit that nothing has been awarded
towards future prospects. A meager amount has been granted under
conventional heads. He would further submit that the multiplier has wrongly
been applied. He, therefore, urged for enhancement of compensation.
1 / 3
967-FA-823-15.odt
3. Learned counsel for Respondent No1. - insurance company would,
on the other hand, submit that it was a joint family of the deceased i.e. the
appellants and other siblings. There is evidence that the loan installment was
being paid out of the joint family funds. He further submits that the amount
awarded under the impugned award is just and reasonable one and no
interference is warranted therewith. He brought to the notice of this Court
that there was delay of 1449 days in preferring the appeal. Same was
condoned on condition that no interest for the delayed period shall be
awarded.
4. Considered the submissions advanced. Perused the impugned
award. The incident dates back to 2007. There is evidence to indicate that
the loan installment was being paid out of the joint family funds. Income of
Rs.3,000/- per month is modest one in the days of the accident. As such, this
Court is not inclined to make any enhancement in the notional income of the
deceased. The amount of compensation is required to be re-worked out in
terms of the Apex Court judgments in National Insurance Company Vs.
Pranay Sethi reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680 and Magma General Insurance
Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram and Others reported in (2018) 18
SCC 130, same would be as under :-
2 / 3
967-FA-823-15.odt
Sr. Particulars Amount No.
1. Monthly income of the deceased 3,000 2. Annual income of the deceased (3,000 x 12) 36,000 3. Plus : 40% towards future prospects 14,400 50,400 4. Less : Since the dependents are three in number, 1/3rd thereof 16,800 33,600
to be deducted towards living and personal expenses
5. Applying multiplier of 18 6,04,800
6. Plus : Each of the claimants awarded Rs.40,000/- towards 1,20,000 7,24,800 loss of love and affection
7. Plus : Funeral expenses and loss of estate 30,000 7,54,800
This way, the total amount of compensation would come to
Rs.7,54,800/-.
5. The appeal thus stands disposed of in terms of following order :-
(i) The appeal partly succeeds.
(ii) The amount of compensation is enhanced from
Rs.3,93,500/- to Rs.7,54,800/-
(iii) Amount of Rs.1,50,000/- shall not carry interest pendente
lite.(i.e. from the date of petition to the date of this order)
(iv) The appellants shall also not be entitled for interest for a period of 1449 days.
( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD
3 / 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!