Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11810 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1065 OF 2019
IN
COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2017
Amrutlal Premji Patel .. Applicant/Decree Holder
v/s.
Nirman Realtors & Developers
Limited & Ors. .. Judgment Debtors/Respondents
Mr. Aseem Naphade a/w Rekha Shinde i/b. Legal Chartered for the
applicant.
Mr. Makrand V. Raut a/w Manoj Nikam for respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.
DATED : 25TH AUGUST, 2021.
P.C. :
1. By this Chamber Summons, the applicant seek a direction to the
judgment debtors to remain present in court so as to be examined
on oath as to their assets and to ascertain means of satisfying the
Consent Award dated 31st August, 2015. The applicant also seeks
a direction to produce the books of accounts and documents for Digitally
the said purpose.
signed by SANDHYA SANDHYA BHAGU BHAGU WADHWA WADHWA Date:
2021.08.26
16:12:41 +0530
13.chscd-1065-19.doc wadhwa
2. Respondent no.1 is a limited company. Respondent nos. 2 to 4 are
said to be Directors of respondent no.1. Today all respondents are
represented by counsel who states that a sum of Rs.62 lakhs has
been paid pursuant to the Consent Award. According to him,
there are reciprocal obligations which the applicants are not
complying with. This is sought to be disputed. Today Mr. Raut
states that there are minor issues pending which can be resolved
as amongst the parties. The fact remains that there is an award
for money and clause 11 of the Consent Award reveals that upon
receipt of the sum of Rs.2.80 crores with interest, the claimants
have to execute a "No Due Certificate" and thereby relinquish the
right, title and interest in respect of the development agreement
dated 14th February, 2008. Prima facie there appears to be no
reason for not complying with the Consent Award and making
payment of the aforesaid sum.
3. In that view of the matter and considering that there is no
affidavit in reply despite service of this application upon the
respondents in 2019, a fact that the respondents counsel fairly
admits, there is no reason to keep this application pending. In fact
this Chamber Summons is liable to be allowed. However,
13.chscd-1065-19.doc wadhwa considering the prayers, the following order is passed;
(i) The respondents shall file separate affidavits of disclosure
disclosing all their assets supported by relevant documents,
originals of which will be offered for inspection within one week
of such disclosure.
(ii) Disclosure affidavit shall accordingly be filed within three
weeks from today. Thus, by the end of 4 th week, inspection shall
also be completed.
(iii) In the meantime, after disclosure is completed, the applicant
will be at liberty to seek clarifications from the deponents of the
affidavits, If the disclosure is incomplete or inaccurate, it will be
necessary to examine the respondents on oath and to that extent
reserving liberty to apply in this very Chamber Summons.
(iv) The Chamber Summons is disposed, in the event of
non-compliance, liberty to revive this chamber summons.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
13.chscd-1065-19.doc wadhwa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!