Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11715 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2021
7apl 309.2020.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application (APL) No. 309/2020
Kamlakar s/o Sharad Visale
..VS..
State of Maharashtra and anr.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order__________________________________________________________
Ms. Falguni Badani h/f. Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocates for the
applicant
Shri S.D. Sirpurkar, APP for the non-applicant no. 1/State
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.
DATED : 24/08/2021
In this application, the applicant has placed reliance on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court to contend that there was no fresh material before the sanctioning Authority to have taken a second look at the question of grant of sanction to prosecute the applicant. It is contended that Court below was not justified in taking the view that the matter deserves to go to trial. It is for the prosecution to demonstrate as to what material was available with the sanctioning Authority, when the sanction was refused not once, but thrice.
2. In the present case, before ultimately issuing the sanction on 25.03.2013, reply filed on behalf of the non-applicant no. 1/State does not refer to the material on record pertaining to the question of grant of sanction to
SMGate
7apl 309.2020.odt
prosecute the applicant.
3. In this backdrop, learned APP seeks time to file additional-affidavit to place on record the relevant material.
4. The additional-affidavit be filed within a period of three weeks from today, list thereafter.
JUDGE
SMGate
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!