Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11608 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021
Dusane 1/2 18 CRA 329.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2019
Mr. Nimesh Narottam Suchde & Anr. .... Applicants
Vs.
Mr. Vishal Shyamsundar Kalantri .... Respondent
Mr. Jaideep Mitra i/by Mr. Ramprakash Pandey for Applicants.
None for Respondent
Coram : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
Date : 23rd AUGUST, 2021
P.C.:
1. In response to the Court's query on the maintainability of
the present Revision Application, which is preferred directly against the
order of rejection of Exhibit 5, i.e. prayer for grant of temporary
injunction, by relying on the judgment of this Court in the matter of
Shobha Dinesh Supare and Anr. Vs. Dinesh Namdeorao Supare,
reported in 1993 Maharashtra Law Journal, page 910, learned counsel
submits that since the appeal against the order is not maintainable and
Dusane 2/2 18 CRA 329.2019.doc
the Court has ruled against the order of rejection of Exhibit 5 i.e. prayer
for grant of temporary injunction before the first Court, a revision is
maintainable.
2. In substance, the submissions are, in case if the suit is
preferred before the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, an application
Exhibit 5 i.e. prayer for grant of temporary injunction is rejected, the
appeal shall not lie before the learned Sessions Court, but straightaway
Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure
against such order is maintainable before this Court.
3. Learned counsel seeks time to prepare the matter so as to
substantiate his contentions on merits.
4. Accordingly, adjourned to 6th September, 2021, as prayed.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!