Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manisha Eknath Toradmal Alias ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 11578 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11578 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2021

Bombay High Court
Manisha Eknath Toradmal Alias ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 23 August, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, R. N. Laddha
                                        1                                wp 9208.21

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 9208 OF 2021

          Manisha Eknath Toradmal @
          Manisha Ramesh Vibhute                            ..    Petitioner

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and others               ..    Respondents

 Shri Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate for the Petitioner.
 Shri S. W. Mundhe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

                           CORAM :    S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                      R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2021.

FINAL ORDER :

. The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that, the validation proceeding in respect of tribe claim of the petitioner is pending. The employer has issued show cause notice to the petitioner to produce validity certificate, else adverse action would be taken and petitioner would be placed on supernumerary post.

2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents/State.

3. It is submitted that, the validation proceeding is pending with the committee since the year 2011.

4. Considering the fact that, the validation proceeding is

2 wp 9208.21

pending with the Committee, we pass following order.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 14 th September, 2021. The Committee shall endeavour to decide the validation proceeding on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. The petitioner shall co-operate in expeditious disposal of the proceeding. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The employer may not take adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending. Of course, the employer may take further course of action depending upon the judgment that may be delivered in the validation proceedings.

6. In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

bsb/Aug.21

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter