Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vikas Bhimrao Mane ( Sarjerao ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 6768 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6768 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vikas Bhimrao Mane ( Sarjerao ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 27 April, 2021
Bench: S.S. Shinde, Manish Pitale
                                              1/4                          WP-1496-2021.doc




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1496 OF 2021

Vikas Bhimrao Mane
(Sarjerao S/o Bhimrao Mane
brother of the petitioner confined,
at Central Jail, Yerwada as convict
no. 17772), Age-32 years,
Occ- Job, R/o B-104, Saket Apartment,
Dange Colony, Nalasopara, West, Thane.                  ...PETITIONER

         Versus

1]       The State of Maharashtra
         Through Inspector General of Prisons
         Pune.

2]       Deputy Inspector General
         Prisons, Yerwada, Pune.

3]   Superintendent
     Yerwada Central Prison, Pune.         ...RESPONDENTS
                                 ...
Mr. Rupesh Jaiswal for Petitioner.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for State.
                                 ...
                          CORAM : S. S. SHINDE &
                                     MANISH PITALE, JJ.

RESERVED ON : 22nd APRIL, 2021.

PRONOUNCED ON: 27th APRIL, 2021.

JUDGMENT [PER S.S. SHINDE, J.]:

. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard with the

consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. The Petitioner who is brother of the cnovict has filed the

present petition for the following substantial reliefs:

Bhagyawant Punde





                                         2/4                           WP-1496-2021.doc




B) By Writ of Mandamus, or appropriate Writ, order or direction in like nature to Quash and

dated 1.3.2021 and 27.10.2020 respectively and thereby direct Respondent No. 3 to release Petitioner's brother (Sarjerao S/o Bhimrao Mane, Confined at Central Jail, Yerwada as convict no 17772) on Furlough Leave for 28 days and or,

3. The convict Sarjerao Mane is convicted for the offences

under Section 302 of IPC for life. Learned counsel appearing for the

Petitioner submits that the convict has undergone more than 4

years imprisonment and he is lodged in the Yerwada Central Prison,

Pune. It is submitted that the application of the convict to release

him on furlough was rejected on the ground that there is adverse

police report. Therefore, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner

submits that, merely because there is adverse police report cannot

be a ground to reject the application of the petitioner for furlough.

4. Learned APP appearing for Respondent-State submits

that the prayer of the petitioner to release him on furlough has

rightly been turned down by the respondent authority.

5. We have given careful consideration to the submissions

of learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned APP

appearing for the Respondent-State. With the able assistance of

Bhagyawant Punde

3/4 WP-1496-2021.doc

learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned APP, we

have perused the pleadings and grounds in the petition, annexures

thereto, impugned order. Upon perusal of impugned order it

appears that the application for furlough leave filed by the

petitioner's brother has been rejected on the ground that as a

matter of right the convict cannot be released on furlough.

Secondly, the report submitted by the Sub Divisional Police Officer,

Dahivadi Division, Camp Vaduj is adverse to the convict inasmuch

as it is mentioned in the said report that the convict shall not be

released on furlough. If he is released on furlough, he is not likely to

report back to the jail authority.

6. In our opinion the apprehension expressed by the Sub

Divisional Police Officer, Dahivadi Division, Camp Vaduj that in

case the convict is released on furlough, he will not report back to

the jail authority is not supported by the specific instances or

reasons. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is partly

allowed. The impugned orders dated 01.03.2021 and 27.10.2020,

passed by Respondent No. 1 and 2, respectively, are quashed and

set aside. The convict is granted liberty to apply afresh for grant of

furlough within one week from today. Upon filing such an

application, the respondent authority shall decide the same on its

Bhagyawant Punde

4/4 WP-1496-2021.doc

own merits, as expeditiously as possible, however, within three

weeks from the date of filing of the application in accordance with

the Prisions (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and

keeping in view the factors like the extent of spread of Covid-19

virus and conditions in jail.

7. Rule is partly made absolute to above extent. The writ

petition stands disposed of accordingly.

( MANISH PITALE, J.)                                (S. S. SHINDE, J.)




Bhagyawant Punde





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter