Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6151 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2021
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order dated 07/06/2021
osk 26-IA-1109-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1109 OF 2021
IN
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2021
1. Jignesh Rajendra Bhatt &
2. Ashwin Govardhandas Gohil ... Applicants
V/s.
Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Subhash Jha a/w. Mr.Harekrishna Mishra i/b. Law Global for Applicants.
Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for Respondent No.1-CBI.
Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 6th April 2021.
P.C. :
This is an application for suspension of sentence and releasing the
Applicants on bail.
2. Heard Mr.Jha, learned counsel for the Applicants,
Ms.Kuttikrishnan, learned counsel for Respondent No.1-CBI and Mr.Hulke,
learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
3. The Applicants are original Accused Nos.2 and 3 in C.C. No.1042/
PW/2009 (Old C.C. No.6/P/1999).
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order dated 07/06/2021
osk 26-IA-1109-2021.odt
The Applicants have been convicted under Section 420, 465, 467,
468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and were directed to suffer
maximum simple imprisonment for 3 years each and to pay a total fine of
Rs.30,000/- each by the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3 rd Court,
Esplanade, Mumbai in C.C. No.1042/PW/2009 (Old C.C. No.6/P/1999).
Criminal Appeal No. 614 of 2011 filed by the Applicants has been
partly allowed by the learned Special Judge (CBI), Gr. Mumbai by its
Judgment and Order dated 2nd March 2021. The Appellate Court by its
impugned Judgment and Order dated 2 nd March 2021 has confirmed the
conviction and sentence of the Applicant No.1 Jignesh Rajendra Bhatt. The
Appellate Court has also confirmed the conviction of Applicant No.2 Ashwin
Govardhandas Gohil, however modified the substantive sentence imposed
upon him by the Trial Court from 3 years to 6 months of simple imprisonment
for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of the
Indian Penal Code.
4. Mr.Jha, learned counsel for the Applicants, on instructions,
submitted that, the Applicants have already deposited the entire fine amount
in the Registry of the Trial Court. He on instructions further submitted that,
the Applicants were on bail during trial so also during the pendency of the
appeal and there is no report of breach of any of the conditions imposed upon
them.
This Order is modified/corrected by Speaking to Minutes Order dated 07/06/2021
osk 26-IA-1109-2021.odt
5. The sentence imposed upon the Applicants is a short term
sentence. The possibility of hearing the present Appeal on its own merits in
near future is remote. In view thereof, the sentence imposed upon the
Applicants can be suspended and they can be released on bail.
6. Hence, the following Order :-
(i) During the pendency of the present Appeal, the substantive sentence imposed upon the Applicants is suspended.
(ii) The Applicants be released on bail in C.C.
No.1042/PW/2009 (Old C.C. No.6/P/1999) on their furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- each, with one or two local sureties in the like amount.
7. Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
[A.S. GADKARI, J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!