Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 669 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2018
(1) 942- FA 825 of 2005 & ors.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 FIRST APPEAL NO. 825 OF 2005
1. The State of Maharashtra
Through- Dist.Collector, Beed.
2. The Executive Engineer,
Minor Irrigation Local Sector,
Beed. ..Appellants
VERSUS
1. Popat Mohanrao Sirsat, age 38 years.
2. Subhash Mohanrao Sirsat, age 36 years
3. Balasaheb Mohanrao Sirsat, age 34 years
4. Keshav Mohanrao Sirsat, age 31 years.
All Occu.: Agriculturist, R/o.Manur,
Taluka Patoda, Dist.Beed. ..Respondents
...
AGP for Appellants : Mr.A.M.Phule
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr.S.S.Thombre
(absent)
...
WITH
FA/826/2005 WITH FA/827/2005
...
CORAM : M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 18th January, 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT:-
1) Heard Mr.A.M.Phule learned AGP for the appellants.
The respondents though served neither present nor
(2) 942- FA 825 of 2005 & ors.
represented.
2) Since, these three appeals arise out of acquisition
in pursuance of one and the same Section 4 Notification,
it is only appropriate that they are disposed of by a
common Judgment and Order.
3) In these matters, the Land Acquisition Officer
determined compensation in respect of the acquired land @
Rs.365/- per Are. The Reference Court has enhanced the
same to Rs.1,250/- per Are.
4) Perusal of the record as well as impugned Judgment
and Award indicate that the claimants had produced
several Sale-Deeds in respect of the lands from the very
same village and the rate as per the said Sale-Deeds
ranges from Rs.1,233/- per Are to Rs.2,000/- per Are. The
Reference Court by detail discussion in paragraph Nos.23,
25 and 26 in the impugned award has determined the
compensation @ Rs.1,250/- per Are. Reasons for such
(3) 942- FA 825 of 2005 & ors.
determination have been set out in the impugned Award and
there is no illegality in the same.
5) Apart from this, the enhanced rate in the present
case is well within the limit prescribed in the
Government Resolution dated 3.11.2016 as amended from
time to time. This Government Resolution relates to the
policy of the State Government that it shall not
institute or pursue appeals where the enhanced
compensation is less than four times of the Ready
Reckoner Rate prevalent on the date of the issue of
Section 4 Notification.
6) For the aforesaid reasons, these appeals are
dismissed.
7) Civil Applications if any, do not survive and are
disposed of.
[M.S.SONAK, J.] SPT/942- FA 825 of 2005 & ors.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!