Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 1008 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2018
1 appln1471.1608.10.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1471/2010
K. N. Grant, Director,
c/o ITC Limited, Virginia House,
37, J L Nehru Road, Kolkata-700071 .....APPLICANT
...V E R S U S...
1. The State of Maharashtra through
Food and Civil Supplies Department,
Mantralaya, Madam Cama Road,
Mumbai- 400 032.
2. The Inspector of Legal Metrology,
Amravati Division 3, having its
Office at c/o Dr. Borade Hospital,
2, Anand State Bank Colony,
Central Jail Road, Camp,
Amravati 444 602. ...NON APPLICANT
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1608/2010
1. Mr. Yogesh Chander Deveshwar
Chairman, ITC Ltd. Virginia House,
37, J L Nehru Road, Kolkata-700071
through his power of attorney,
Bishwa Behali Chatterjee.
2. Mr. Krishnamoorthy Vaidyanath,
Director, ITC Limited, Virginia House,
37, J L Nehru Road, Kolkata-700071 .....APPLICANTS
...V E R S U S...
1. The State of Maharashtra through
Food and Civil Supplies Department,
Mantralaya, Madam Cama Road,
Mumbai- 400 032.
::: Uploaded on - 22/02/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2018 01:16:56 :::
2 appln1471.1608.10.odt
2. The Inspector of Legal Metrology,
Amravati Division 3, having its
Office at c/o Dr. Borade Hospital,
2, Anand State Bank Colony,
Central Jail Road, Camp,
Amravati 444 602. ...NON APPLICANT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Sunil Manohar Senior Advocate with Mr. N. A. Gaikwad,
Advocate for applicants.
Mr. N. B. Jawade, A.P.P. for non applicants-State
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM:- V. M. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 25.01.2018
JUDGMENT
1. These two applications can conveniently be decided by
this common judgment since in both these applications, the prayer is
to quash and set aside Criminal Complaint No.2201/2010 pending
on the file of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.10, Amravati
and to set aside the order of issuance of process dated 25.08.2010
passed by the said learned Judicial Magistrate First Class.
2. Heard Mr. Sunil Manohar, learned Senior Counsel for the
applicants and Mr. N.B. Jawade, learned A.P.P. for the non
applicants-State.
3. The applicants in these applications are Directors of a
Company by name; ITC Limited registered under the Companies Act
3 appln1471.1608.10.odt
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company"). The Company is a multi
divisional and multi produce Company and it is engaged in various
businesses of trading in bulk in various agricultural commodities and
in retail sale of various fast moving consumer goods. It also sales
various agricultural inputs like seeds, insecticides, fertilizers and
other agricultural implements, machines and equipments through its
one of division which is known as 'Agri Business Division' having its
headquarters at Secunderabad. The Agri Business Division has
branches in various States of the country. One of such branch is
situated at Nagpur.
4. According to the applicant, Agri Business Division of the
Company has set up various farmer facilities centres which are called
as 'Choupal Sagar' in different parts of the State. One of such
Choupal Sagar is set up at Nandgaonpeth, Amravati. The farmers
can also buy their domestic requirements and farm needs from the
said retail outlet.
5. It is the case of the applicant that on 26.02.2010, the
Inspector of Legal Metrology, Amravati Division, Amravati, seized
four Kurtas of 'Sultan' brand vide seizure memo dated 26.10.2010. As
per the seizure memo, the said Kurtas were seized on the ground that
4 appln1471.1608.10.odt
the said Kurtas which were kept in display in the show-case for
selling purpose, did not disclose the measurements as per the
Standards of Weights and Measures Act. Further, instead of
mentioning maximum retail price (MRP), the Kurtas carried 'Choupal
Sagar Price' of Rs.249/- which includes all taxes.
6. Non applicant no.2 filed a criminal complaint before the
learned Magistrate against the applicants and others under the
provisions of Section 39 of the Standards of Weights and Measures
Act, 1976 read with Rule 23 (1) of the Standards of Weights and
Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 and under Section 63
of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. The said
criminal complaint is registered as Compliant Case No.2201/2010
and the learned Magistrate, according to the applicants, has without
applying mind passed the order summoning the applicants to appear
in the Court.
7. Mr. Manohar, learned Senior Counsel for the applicants,
submitted that the applicants are not incharge of and not responsible
for any day-to-day management and the activities of Choupal Sagar.
He invited my attention to the complaint to show that there are no
allegations or averments in the complaint that the applicants were
5 appln1471.1608.10.odt
incharge of the company or are responsible to the Company for its
day-to-day management and business or they have consented for the
act. He submitted that in absence of specific role being attributed to
the applicants, they cannot be impleaded in the complaint as the
accused and filing of the complaint against the applicants is an abuse
of process of law. He submitted that the issue is already decided in
various cases under the various Acts. He invited my attention to the
case in Santanu Jagatbandhu Sinha .Vs. State of Maharashtra;
.
reported in 2007 (5) AIR Bom R 740
8. Section 62 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act
reads as under:
"62. Offences by Companies.--
(1) If the person committing an offence under this Act is a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub- section shall render any person liable to punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge, or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
6 appln1471.1608.10.odt
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly."
9. By now the law is well settled in view of various decisions
of the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd .Vs. Neeta
Bhalla and anr; reported in (2005) 8 SCC 89, and the view of this
Court in Charandas Vallabhdas Mariwala and ors. .Vs. The State
of Maharashtra, judgment dated 10.07.2014, by which it is ruled
that the complaint must contain pleadings to the effect that the
persons who are sought to be prosecuted are either incharge of the
business or responsible to the company for conduct of business.
10. In the present case, there is no whisper in the complaint
that the present applicants are responsible for day-to-day affairs of
the company or the Choupal Sagar.
7 appln1471.1608.10.odt
10. On this short count itself the complaint filed against the
present applicants is required to be set aside. Consequently,
following order is passed:
ORDER
(i) Criminal Application Nos.1471/2010 and 1608/2010 are
allowed.
(ii) The order of issuance of summons dated 25.08.2010
passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.10, Amravati in
Summary Case No.2201/2010, against the present applicants, is
quashed and set aside.
(iii) Summary Case No.2201/2010 pending on the file of
Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.10, Amravati is quashed and
set aside qua the present applicants only.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
JUDGE
kahale
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!