Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7017 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2017
1 jg.apl 174.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Criminal Application (APL) No. 174 of 2017
(1) Tejas Alias Sunil S/o Manohar
Sawake, aged about 36 years,
Occ. Service R/o. Village Malkapur
Tq. and Distt. Akola, at present
R/o. MLA Hostel, Manora Building
Mumbai.
(2) Shobha Manohar Sawake,
Aged about 62 years,
R/o. Village Malkapur
Tq. and Distt. Akola.
(3) Sau. Shilpa w/o Gopal Pande
Aged about 27 years,
(4) Sopan Vinayak Pande,
Aged about 35 years,
No. 3 and 4 R/o. Post Bopori
Tq. Murtizapur Distt. Akola.
(5) Chaya Digambar Ganjare
Aged about 27 years, Occ. Service
R/o Nage Layout, Lahariya Nagar
Akola Tq. and Distt. Akola. .... Applicants
// Versus //
State of Maharashtra through
Police Station Officer, P.S. Khadan
Akola Tq. And Distt. Akola. .... Respondent
Shri J. B. Gandhi, Advocate for the applicants
Shri K. R. Lule, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATE : 12-9-2017.
.....2/-
2 jg.apl 174.17.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The criminal
application is heard finally at the stage of admission with the consent of
the learned counsel for the parties.
By this criminal application, the applicants seek the quashing
and setting aside of the First Information Report registered against the
applicant nos. 1 to 4 for the offences punishable under Sections 375(4),
375, 417, 493, 495 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. The
applicants have also sought the quashing of the criminal proceedings
pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Akola.
It is not in dispute that the applicant no. 1 Tejas had, during
the subsistence of his marriage with his wife, performed the marriage
with the applicant no. 5 Chaya though the said marriage cannot be a
legal and valid marriage in the eye of law. There were disputes between
the applicant no. 1 and the applicant no. 5 and it is alleged by the
applicant no. 5 in the report lodged by her in the Police Station on
8-3-2014 that she was not aware that the applicant no. 1 was already
married when she was in relationship with him. The report was lodged
by the applicant no. 5 against the applicant no. 1 for the offences
punishable under Sections 375(4) and 375 of the Penal Code and against
.....3/-
3 jg.apl 174.17.odt
the other applicants, i.e. the applicant nos. 2 to 4, for the offences
punishable under Sections 417, 493 and 495 of the Penal Code. It is the
case of the applicants that the wife of the applicant no. 1 was aware
about the relationship between the applicant no. 1 and the applicant no.
5 and she had executed deed of consent for the marriage of the applicant
no. 1 with the applicant no. 5 during the subsistence of her marriage with
him. Be that as it may, some proceedings were filed by the applicant
no. 1 and the applicant no. 5 in Family Court, Akola for a decree of
divorce by consent and it appears that the Family Court, Akola has
granted a decree of divorce by allowing the application filed by the
applicant no. 1 and the applicant no. 5. We however doubt whether this
marriage between the applicant no. 1 and the applicant no. 5 is legal and
valid and whether the same could have been dissolved by decree of
divorce. Now, the applicant nos. 1 to 5 are stated to have settled the
dispute between them and according to the applicant no. 5, she is not
interested in prosecuting the applicant nos. 1 to 4. It is stated that in the
peculiar circumstances of the case, this Court may quash and set aside
the FIR registered against the applicant nos. 1 to 4, as also the criminal
proceedings arising therefrom.
The applicants are personally present in the Court today. It is not
disputed by the applicant no. 1 that he had married (though it may not
.....4/-
4 jg.apl 174.17.odt
be legal) with the applicant no. 5. It is stated by him that the applicant
no. 5 was aware about the fact that he was married. The applicant no. 5
has however stated that she was not aware about the said position. It
is further stated by her that in any case, she does not want to proceed
against the applicant nos. 1 to 4 in the trial that is pending against them
before the Sessions Court at Akola. It is stated that in the peculiar
circumstances of the case, the First Information Report registered against
the applicant nos. 1 to 4 should be quashed and set aside.
When the matters are settled between the parties to the
dispute, by following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC
303, normally we are inclined to quash and set aside the First
Information Report registered against the accused without imposing any
conditions while doing so. This is however a peculiar case where the
applicant no. 1 had sought to marry the applicant no. 5 though his
marriage with his wife was subsisting. It also prima facie appears from
the consent letter that is executed by the wife of the applicant no. 1 that
though the applicant no. 5 must be aware about the subsistence of the
marital relationship between the applicant no. 1 and his wife, she has
entered into a relationship with him and both of them have made a show
of marrying each other though the marriage between them is not legal.
.....5/-
5 jg.apl 174.17.odt
In the peculiar circumstances of the case, we are inclined to quash and
set aside the First Information Report registered against the applicant
nos. 1 to 4 with a view to prevent the abuse of process of Court, since the
prosecution may not result in the conviction of the applicant nos. 1 to 4
as the applicant no. 5 is not ready to prosecute them. It appears that
divorce decree is passed in the proceedings filed in the Family Court at
Akola and in the said proceedings, the applicant no. 5 has accepted a
huge amount of more than Rs. 6 Lakhs towards permanent alimony from
the applicant no. 1. Since we find that the applicant nos. 1 and 5 had
committed a wrong, though we are inclined to quash and set aside the
First Information Report with a view to secure the ends of justice, we
would impose a condition that both the applicant no. 1 and the applicant
no. 5 should pay a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the High Court Legal
Services Sub Committee at Nagpur for providing legal aid to the needy.
The learned counsel for the applicants states that the applicant no. 1 and
the applicant no. 5 would deposit the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each, within
a period of two weeks in the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee,
Nagpur. The statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants
on behalf of the applicant no. 1 and the applicant no. 5 is accepted.
In the circumstances of the case, the criminal application is
allowed. The First Information Report registered against the applicant
.....6/-
6 jg.apl 174.17.odt
nos. 1 to 4 as also the criminal prosecution pending against them on the
basis of the said First Information Report is hereby quashed and set aside
only on the condition that the applicant no. 1 and the applicant no. 5
should deposit the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each (Rs. 50,000/- in all) in the
High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur within two weeks.
Order accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
wasnik
...../-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!