Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8116 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2017
21. wp 3780.17.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3780 OF 2017
Anilkumar Chotelal Yadav .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms.Rohini M. Dandekar, for the Petitioner.
Mrs.G.P. Mulekar, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
12th OCTOBER, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT.
V .K.TAHILRAMANI , J.) :
1. Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner preferred an application for parole on
12/08/2015 on the ground of illness of his mother. The
grievance of the petitioner is that the said application has not
yet been decided
3. During the period of parole, the petitioner wanted to
go to Pratapgad in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The police report
21. wp 3780.17.doc
was called from Superintendent of police, Pratapgad police
station in Uttar Pradesh.
4. Learned APP states that reminders are being sent to
Pratapgad police station, Uttar Pradesh every month by jail
authorities. However, no report has yet been received from
them. She submitted that only on the ground of non- receiving
of the police report, application of the petitioner has remained
pending.
5. In view of the above, directions are given to the jail
authorities to send reminders to the Pratapgad police station,
Uttar Pradesh and as soon as police report is received, decision
be taken on the application of the petitioner for parole within 3
weeks. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
6. Office to communicate this order to the petitioner
who is in the Nashik Road Central Prison.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!