Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nilofar Yasmin Javed (In Jail) And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 9073 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 9073 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Nilofar Yasmin Javed (In Jail) And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 27 November, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                 1                         apl722.17.odt




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

                               NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR



              CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.722 OF 2017



  1. Nilofar Yasmin Javed Ali, 
      Aged about 27 years, Occ.
      Nurse, Near Wahid Khan 
      D.Ed. College, Amravati
      City, District Amravati.

  2. Firoz Shah @ Bhuriya s/o. 
      Yusuf Shah, Aged 30 years,
      Occ. Business, Nagpuri Gate,
      Amravati.

  3. Maqsood (Steelwala) Ahmed
      s/o. Mansoor Ahmed, Aged 
      38 years, Occ. Business, 
      Nagpuri Gate, Amravati.             ..........      APPLICANTS


          // VERSUS //


  State of Maharashtra,
  Through Police Station Officer,
  Police Station, Nagpuri Gate,
  Amravati City, District Amravati.        ..........       RESPONDENT



::: Uploaded on - 29/11/2017                   ::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2017 01:42:30 :::
                                     2                                 apl722.17.odt


  ____________________________________________________________  
              Mr.Rashid Haque, Advocate for the Applicants.
             Mr.V.P.Gangane, A.P.P. for the Respondent/State.
  ____________________________________________________________



                                     CORAM     :  R.K.DESHPANDE 
                                                          AND
                                                          M.G.GIRATKAR, JJ.

DATED : 27th November, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per M.G.Giratkar, J) :

1. The Criminal Application is admitted and heard finally

with the consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.

2. Applicant nos. 1 to 3 have filed the present application

praying to quash and set aside the First Information Report

No.0276/2017, dt.23rd of August, 2017 registered by Police Station,

Nagpuri Gate, Amravati City lodged by applicant no.1 against

applicant nos. 2 and 3.

3. It is stated by the applicants that applicant no.1 married

with Javed Ali, resident of Akot on 17th June, 2007. In the month of

3 apl722.17.odt

December, 2016, there was a dispute between applicant no.1 and her

husband. Applicant no.1 went to her parents at Vadner Gangai along

with dowry articles. She was helped by applicant no.3 Maqsood

Ahmed. Her daughter was studying. Therefore, she shifted to

Amravati. Applicant no.2 Firoz Shah helped her by getting rented

premises for her. He also gave helping hand for getting her work in

the hospital as a nurse.

4. It is the case of applicant no.1 that applicant no.2 Firoz

Shah fell in her love. He was asking her to perform marriage with

him. She was ready to marry with Firoz. Applicant no.3 Maqsood

Ahmed came to know about the relations of applicant no.2 Firoz with

applicant no.1 Nilofar. Therefore, there was a quarrel between

applicant no.1 and applicant nos.2 and 3. She was under mental

tension. Therefore, she lodged report against applicant nos. 2 and 3

alleging that they committed rape on her. It is submitted by the

applicants that applicant no.1 lodged report due to misunderstanding

and loss of mental balance.

5. Heard Mr.R.A.Haque, learned Counsel for the applicants.

He has identified applicant no.1. She is present before the Court. We

4 apl722.17.odt

have asked her about the contents of application. She has stated that

she along with applicant nos. 2 and 3 have arrived at compromise.

Compromise deed is reduced into writing and is filed on record as

Annexure-II. She has stated in the Compromise deed that, due to

misunderstand and loss of mental balance, she lodged report against

applicant nos. 2 and 3. It is further stated that she does not want to

prosecute both applicant nos. 2 and 3 and hence, she has prayed

before us to quash the F.I.R. lodged by her.

6. Applicant no.1 i.e. the complainant herself is praying to

quash the F.I.R. Therefore, keeping case pending against applicant

nos. 2 and 3 is nothing but abuse of process of Court because

applicant no.1 will not depose against them. There is remote chance

of any conviction. Hence, in view of Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another

reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh and Others vs.

State of Punjab and Others, (2014) 6 SCC 466, the First

Information Report lodged by applicant no.1 is liable to be quashed

and set aside. Hence, we allow the application in terms of prayer

clause (a) therein, which reads as under :

5 apl722.17.odt

"(a) The First Information Report No.0276/2017,

dated 23rd of August, 2017, registered by the non-

applicant-Police Station, Nagpuri Gate, Amravati City,

District Amravati (Annexure-II) against the applicant

nos. 2 and 3 alleging commission of the offences

punishable under Sections 376, 376-D, 452 and 506(B)

of Indian Penal Code, 1860 may kindly be quashed and

set aside in the interests of justice."

No order as to costs.

                            JUDGE                       JUDGE
   



  [jaiswal]





                                6               apl722.17.odt





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter