Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 9069 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2017
1 apl763.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.763 OF 2017
1. Sachin Shyamrao Jaiswal,
Aged about 33 years, Occ. Private
Job.
2. Shamrao s/o. Bhuraji Jaiswal,
Aged about 63 years, Occ.Pensioner.
3.Sau.Anusaya w/o. Shamrao Jaiswal,
Aged about 56 years, Occ.Housewife.
4.Dinesh s/o. Shamrao Jaiswal,
Aged about 31 years, Occ. Pvt. Job.
5.Anant @ Shambhu s/o. Shamrao
Jaiswal, Aged about 29 years, Occ.
Private Job.
::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:49:58 :::
2 apl763.17
All 1 to 5 r/o. Plot No.46, Ashadeep
Co-op. Housing Society, Street No.20,
Gorai-1, Boriwali West, Mumbai-92.
6. Rajesh s/o. Girdhari Jaiswal,
Aged about 42 years, Occ. Pvt. Job,
r/o. Adarsha Nagar, Near Saibaba
Temple, Aarey Milk Colony,
Goregaon (East), Mumbai 400065.
7. Sau. Pratibha @ Meena Virendra
Bihare, Aged about 33 years, Occ.
House wife, r/o. 70/C, Vandana
Nagar, Near Tilak Nagar,
Indore - 452001. .......... APPLICANTS
// VERSUS //
1.State of Maharashtra,
Through Police Station Officer,
Police Station, Hudkeshwar,
Nagpur.
2. Sau.Pranali w/o. Sachin Jaiswal,
Aged about 32 years, Occ.
Household, r/o. c/o. Raghuji
Bihare, Plot No.215, Jankinagar,
Near Hanuman Mandir,
::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:49:58 :::
3 apl763.17
Udaynagar Ring Road
Chowk, Nagpur. .......... NON-APPLICANTS/
RESPONDENTS
____________________________________________________________
Mr.H.N.Bhondge, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr.N.S.Rao, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1/State.
Mr.Suryakant Jaiswal, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
____________________________________________________________
CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE
AND
M.G.GIRATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 27th NOVEMBER, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R.K.Deshpande, J) :
1. The Criminal Application is admitted and heard finally
with the consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. Non-applicant no.2/wife Sau. Pranali w/o. Sachin
Jaiswal has filed an affidavit dt.29.9.2017, the contents of which are
re-produced below :
" I, the abovenamed Deponent do hereby take oath and state on Solemn affirmation as under :-
4 apl763.17
1. I state that, the applicant No.1 had filed Petition No.A-488/2015 between Shri Sachin Shyamrao Jaiswal ..Vrs.. Sau. Pranali Sachin Jaiswal. The said matter was referred before Mediator and accordingly mutual mediation agreement took place before Mediator on 6.6.2017.
2. I state that, as per the said Agreement the applicant No.1 has deposited Rs.5,00,000/- towards permanent alimony in the Family Court at Nagpur. I state that, as per said agreement I have to co-operate for quashing of Criminal Case No.3515/2015 pending before Corporation Court No.2, Nagpur i.e. quashing of charge-sheet No.154/2014, dated 27.10.2014, U/Sec.498-A, 34 of I.P.C. and Sec. 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. I state that, I am ready for quashing of charge- sheet and criminal case No.3515/2015 pending before Corporation Court No.2, Nagpur i.e. quashing of charge-sheet No.154/2014 dated 27.10.2014 U/Sec. 498-A, 34 of I.P.C. And Sec. 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act against the applicants, in view of compromise before Mediator, Family Court, Nagpur and as per the Judgment and Decree dated 7.6.2017 passed in Case No.A-488/2015 by Family Court No.2, Nagpur.
Hence, this Affidavit."
5 apl763.17
3. Non-applicant no.2 is also personally present before the
Court and she is identified by her learned Counsel Mr.Suryakant
Jaiswal. We asked her as to whether she wants to continue the
proceedings or wants that the charge-sheet and the proceedings in
question should be quashed and set aside. She states that, as per the
affidavit, she has agreed for quashing the Charge-sheet No.154/2014
and the proceedings in Criminal Case No.3515/2015
4. In view of the above, by consent of the parties, the
Charge-Sheet No.154 of 2014, dt.27.10.2014 in respect of the
offences punishable under Sections 498-A r/w. Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act
along with the proceedings of Criminal Case No.3515 of 2015
against the applicants are quashed and set aside. The Criminal
Application is allowed accordingly in terms of prayer clause thereof.
No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
[jaiswal]
6 apl763.17
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!