Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Asaram Kishanrao Bhavare vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 8656 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8656 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Asaram Kishanrao Bhavare vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 13 November, 2017
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                       1

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR OF BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2008

          Asaram S/o. Kishanrao Bhavare,
          Age. 74 years, Occu. Retired Head Master,
          R/o. Dhanmandi Bag, Aurangapura,
          Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.            ...Petitioner.

                           Versus

 1.       The State of Maharashtra.

 2.       Divisional Commissioner,
          Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

 3.       The Accountant General (A & E) II
          Indian Audit And Account Department
          Office of the Accountant General (A & E) II
          Maharashtra, Nagpur 400 001. 

 4.       The Chief Executive Officer, 
          Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad,
          Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

 5.       The Education Officer, (Primary)
          Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad,
          Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.                          ...Respondents.

 Advocate for Petitioner : Shri V.D. Patnoorkar.
 Addl. GP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Smt. M.A. Deshpande.
 Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Shri D.N. Patil-Bankar.



                                       CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
                                                   SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. 
                                       Dated    : 13rd November, 2017







 ORAL JUDGMENT :



1. Shri Patnoorkar, learned advocate for the petitioner

submits that in similar circumstances, the petitioner has

withdrawn the petition with liberty to initiate proper

proceedings. The Writ Petition No. 333/2008 was accordingly

disposed of with liberty by order dated 08/06/2017. He

submits that the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition

with the same liberty.

2. As such, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with

liberty to the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings.

3. Rule is discharged.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

S.P.C.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter