Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maniyar Gramin Shikshan Prasarak ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 8451 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8451 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Maniyar Gramin Shikshan Prasarak ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 6 November, 2017
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                    1

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUR OF BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO. 6758 OF 2006

 1.       Manyar Gramin Shikshan
          Prasarak Mandal, Golegaonwadi,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded
          Through it's Secretary,
          Basawraj Sangappa Belapure, 
          Age. 36 Years, Occu. Service,
          R/o. C/o. Manyar Gramin Shikshan
          Prasarak Mandal, Golegaonwadi,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded at present
          R/o. Khadalwal Palza,
          Vazirabad Nanded.

 2.       Manyar Gramin Shikshan
          Prasarak Mandal, Golegaonwadi,
          Tal. Loha, dist. Nanded
          Through it's President,
          Sou. Mukta W/o. Maroti Jodtalle,
          Age-27 yrs, Occu- household,
          R/o. Palam Road, Loha Dist. Nanded.             ...Petitioners.
   
                   VERSUS

 1.       State of Maharashtra.

 2.       Deputy Director of Education,
          Latur Division, Latur.

 3.       Education Officer,
          Zilla Parishad, Nanded.

 4.       Assistant Charity Commissioner,
          Nanded Division, Nanded.

 5.       Priyadarshini Shikshan Prasarak




::: Uploaded on - 10/11/2017                 ::: Downloaded on - 11/11/2017 01:32:09 :::
                                    2

          Mandal, Kalka, Tal. Kandhar,
          Dist. Nanded.

 6.       Hanumant Motiram Kendre,
          Age. 42 Years, Occu. Business,
          R/o. Golegaonwadi, post. Golegaon,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 7.       Venkat Khemaji Karad,
          Age. 37 Years, Occu. Business,
          R/o. Shellali, Post: Ambulga,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 8.       Manik Rukmaji Gitte,
          Age: 44 Years, Occu. Business
          R/o. Shellali, Post : Ambulga,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 9.       Madhukar Govind Musale,
          Age: 35 Years, Occu. Business
          R/o. Golegaonwadi, post: Golegaon,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 10.      Subhash Sonba Jaybhaye,
          Age: 42 Years, Occu. Business
          R/o. Ramachi Wadi,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 11.      Balaji Maroti Kendre,
          Age: 42 Years, Occu. Business,
          R/o. Shellali, Post : Ambulga,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 12.      Chandrakant Eknathrao Kendre,
          Age: 35 Years, Occu. Business,
          R/o. Golegaonwadi, Post: Golegaon,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.

 13.      Arjun Rakhmaji Gitte,




::: Uploaded on - 10/11/2017               ::: Downloaded on - 11/11/2017 01:32:09 :::
                                       3

          Age: 50 Years, Occu. Business,
          R/o. Shellali, Post : Ambulga,
          Tal. Loha, Dist. Nanded.                         ...Respondents.

 Advocate for Petitioners : Shri V.J. Dhage. 
 AGP for Respondent No. 1and 2 : Mr. Y.G. Gujrathi.
                                    
                                 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
                                             SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ. 
                                 Dated    : 06th November, 2017

 ORAL JUDGMENT :



1. The petitioner Educational Institution is aggrieved by the

order dated 14/08/2006, passed by the Deputy Director of

Education, Latur Division and the consequential order dated

22.08.2006, passed by the Education Officer, Nanded Nagar

Parishad, by which, the school operated by the petitioner was

transferred to respondent No. 5.

2. The petitioner has put forth its prayers in paragraph 39

(B) to (H) which read as under :

(B) The order dated 14-08-2006, passed by the learned

Deputy Director of Education, Latur division, transferring

the Mankarna Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Loha, in

favour of the respondent no. 5, may please be quashed

and set aside.

(C) The order dated 22-08-2006, passed by the learned

Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nanded, transferring

the Mankarna Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Loha, in

favour of the respondent no. 5, may please be quashed

and set aside.

(D) The respondent no. 5, may please be restrained

from interfering in the management of Mankarna

Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Loha.

(E) Appropriate enquiry and Criminal Proceedings may

please be initiated, against the persons, submitting the

forged and fabricated documents, to the respondent no. 2

and 3.

(F) The sale deed/notarized documents, transferring

the Mankarna Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Lohac to the

respondent no. 5, may please be declared void, and the

petitioners may please be declared as the institution

entitled to manage the Mankarna Prathamik Shala Navi

Vasahat Loha.

(G) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present

writ petition, the effect. operation and execution, of the

order dated 22-08-2006, passed by the Education Officer,

Nanded Nagarparishad, transferring the Mankarna

Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Loha, Dist. Nanded, may

please be stayed.

(H) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present

writ petition the respondent no. 5, may please be

restrained from interfering in the management of

Mankarna Prathamik Shala Navi Vasahat Loha."

3. When, this matter was heard by this Court on

29/09/2006, interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'G' and 'H'

were granted in favour of the petitioner. Consequentially, the

said school is being operated by the petitioner for the last eleven

years during the pendency of this petition.

4. On 13/07/2011, this Court admitted the petition and

confirmed the interim relief.

5. We have considered the strenuous submissions of the

learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGP on behalf

of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

6. We find from the record that the petitioner has been

operating the said school from the academic year 2000-2001. It

was out of an internal dispute and the internal squabbles of the

members of the executive body, that some of the members

resigned and that led to a dispute in the governing body of the

Educational Institution.

7. Considering the above and keeping in view the interim

relief granted by this Court more than eleven years ago, we do

not find that the circumstances in which the impugned orders

were passed in the year 2006, might continue to exist even

today. This Court had stayed the impugned orders upon being

prima facie, convinced that the same are unsustainable.

8. In the light of the above and taking into account the fact

that the petitioner have been conducting the said school for

more than eleven years after the grant of interim relief, this

petition is partly allowed. The impugned orders dated

14/08/2006 and 22/08/2006 are quashed and set aside.

9. Needless to state, the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 authorities

would be at liberty to consider the present facts and

circumstances pertaining to the Mankarna Prathmik Vidyalaya,

Loha and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioners, may review the situation if deemed necessary. The

interests of the students shall be of prime importance.

10. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

S.P.C.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter