Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2450 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2017
WP/4823/2000
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4823 OF 2000
1. State Transport Cooperative
Bank Limited, Mumbai
Dr. Anandrao Nair Road,
Maharashtra Wahatuk Bhawan,
Mumbai 400 008.
2. State Transport Cooperative
Bank Limited, Branch Shrirampur,
Dist. Ahmednagar, through it's
Branch Manager. ..Petitioners
Versus
Nana Gangaram Mahandul,
R/o Shrirampur, District
Ahmednagar. ..Respondent
...
None present.
...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
Dated: May 09, 2017 ...
ORAL JUDGMENT:-
1. None present for the parties.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the ad-interim order dated
23.8.2000 passed by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar in Complaint
(ULP) No.117 of 2000.
3. The impugned order reads as under:-
WP/4823/2000
"1. The ad-interim application is allowed.
2. The order passed below Exh.U-2, dt. 9.6.2000 stands confirmed staying the operation of the transfer order dated 3.6.2000 in respect of complainant.
3. Parties to proceed with the main complaint."
4. By the above reproduced order, the stay to the transfer order
dated 3.6.2000 was continued by allowing the ad-interim application.
5. By order dated 5.12.2000, this Court, after hearing the learned
Advocates for the respective sides, admitted the petition and
granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (C). Consequentially,
the above reproduced interlocutory order was stayed by this Court.
6. Considering the above and keeping in view that the
interlocutory order passed by the Industrial Court has been stayed for
the last 17 years, I deem it proper to dispose off the petition by
continuing the interim relief granted by this Court on 5.12.2000 till
Complaint (ULP) No.117 of 2000 is decided by the Industrial Court,
Ahmednagar, if not already decided.
7. As such, this petition is partly allowed and the interim relief
WP/4823/2000
granted by this Court, by which, the interim order of the Industrial
Court dated 23.8.2000 was stayed, shall continue till Complaint (ULP)
No.117 of 2000 is decided by the Industrial Court, if not already
decided. The Industrial Court shall endeavour to decide the said
Complaint after issuing notices to the litigating sides, as
expeditiously as possible and preferably on/or before 28.2.2018.
Needless to state, the above direction would merge in the final
judgment of the Industrial Court in the event Complaint (ULP) No.117
of 2000 has not been decided by this date.
8. The said complaint, if not already disposed off, shall be
decided on its own merits.
9. Rule is made partly absolute.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
...
akl/d
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!