Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chintaman Narayan Raut And Others vs Sanjay Ramsing Solanke And Others
2017 Latest Caselaw 698 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 698 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2017

Bombay High Court
Chintaman Narayan Raut And Others vs Sanjay Ramsing Solanke And Others on 14 March, 2017
Bench: S.B. Shukre
                                       (1)                            wp3045.17+

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 3045 OF 2017

1.    Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut            ..                   Petitioners
      Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri.,
      R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road,
      Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur,
      Dist. Ahmednagar.

2.    Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre
      Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3.    Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre
      Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri.,
      Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon,
      Dist. Aurangabad.

                                      Versus

1.    Sanjay s/o. Ramsing Solanke                        ..       Respondents

Age. 46 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3047 OF 2017

(2) wp3045.17+

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

Versus

1. Raosaheb s/o. Ratansing Solanke .. Respondents Age. 45 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3051 OF 2017

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre

(3) wp3045.17+

Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

Versus

1. Balu s/o. Trimbak Khandale .. Respondents Age. 55 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3052 OF 2017

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

                             Versus





                                        (4)                            wp3045.17+


1.    Vijay s/o. Namdeo Solanke                          ..       Respondents

Age. 43 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3053 OF 2017

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

Versus

1. Latabai w/o. Balu Khandale .. Respondents Age. 55 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra,

(5) wp3045.17+

Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3054 OF 2017

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

Versus

1. Sunil s/o. Ananda Patil .. Respondents Age. 30 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

(6) wp3045.17+

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3055 OF 2017

1. Chintaman s/o. Narayan Raut .. Petitioners Age. 50 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. Super Drycleaners, Gondavni Road, Shrirampur, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar.

2. Subhash s/o. Baliram Thakre Age. 35 years, Occ. Agri.,

3. Sau. Sangita w/o. Subhash Thakre Age. 27 years, Occ. Agri., Both R/o. At Post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

Versus

1. Vijay s/o. Trimbak (Khandale) Patil .. Respondents Age. 55 years, Occ. Agri., R/o. At post Varthan, Tq. Soyegaon, Dist. Aurangabad.

2. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Co-operative Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3. The Divisional Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

4. The District Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad.

(7) wp3045.17+

Mr.R.V. Gore, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent/State.

CORAM : S.B. SHUKRE,J.

DATED : 14.03.2017 ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. By order commonly passed on 15.10.2016, the Divisional Jt. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, has rejected the prayer of the petitioners to stay the effect and operation of the order passed by the Dy. Registrar, till final disposal of the appeals.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for respondent Nos.2 to 4, who appears by waiving notice on behalf of the respondents. At this stage there is no need to issue notice to respondent No.1.

4. Considering the stage of appeals pending before the Divisional Jt. Registrar, Aurangabad and the orders passed by the Dy. Registrar, the Divisional Jt. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Aurangabad, has rejected the prayer of the petitioners to stay the effect and operation of the orders passed by the Dy. Registrar,

(8) wp3045.17+

till final disposal of the appeals. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that all these appeals are kept for final hearing on 29.03.2017 and are likely to be disposed of thereafter shortly. Considering the fact that these appeals are now kept for final disposal, any order passed in these writ petitions would be of only academic nature and therefore at this stage this Court does not find it necessary to make any interference in the impugned orders.

5. The writ petitions, are disposed of with a direction that all the appeals shall be finally disposed of by respondent No.3 as expeditiously as possible after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to both the sides. Respondent No.3 shall make endeavour to dispose of these appeals as far as possible within two months after arguments are heard.

6. Rule discharged subject to above observations.

[S.B. SHUKRE,J.] snk/2017/MAR17/wp3045.17+

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter