Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 671 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2017
5. cri wp 653-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 653 OF 2017
Chandra Rama Pujari @ Shankar @
Sanjay Suvarn @ Nagesh Vishnu Pawar .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
...................
Appearances
Mr. Prosper D'Souza Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner
Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
...................
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 10, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
1. Heard both sides.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he preferred an
application for parole on 03.05.2016 on the ground of illness
of his mother. The grievance of the petitioner is that though
the application for parole was preferred on 03.05.2016, the
said application has not been decided yet, hence, this
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
5. cri wp 653-17.doc
petition.
4. Learned APP, on instructions, states that the application
of the petitioner for parole has been considered and it has
been rejected by order dated 9.3.2017. Copy of the said
order is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
Now, the petitioner has a remedy of preferring appeal
against the said order of rejection. In case, the appeal is
preferred, the same to be considered expeditiously by the
concerned authorities.
5. In view of the above facts, the grievance of the
petitioner does not survive, hence, rule is discharged.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!