Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1035 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2017
jdk 1 10.cr.wp.518.17.j.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 518 OF 2017
Amol Ambadas Bankar ]
Age Adult, Occ: Nil ]
Residing at C/o Sangeeta Balu Borate ]
Village Kathi, Tal. Indapur, Dist.Pune ]
Presently lodged in Kalamba Central ]
Prison, Kolhapur ].. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State of Maharashtra ]
]
2. The Deputy Inspector General, ]
Prison, Pune-6 ]
]
3. The Inspector General, Prison, ]
Pune-1, Maharashtra ]
]
4. The Superintendent of Jail ]
Kalamba Central, Prison, ]
Kolhapur ]..Respondents
....
Mr. B.G. Tangsali Advocate i/b Mr. Santosh S. Musale Advocate
for Petitioner
Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
....
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 24, 2017
1 of 3
jdk 2 10.cr.wp.518.17.j.doc
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]: 1 Heard both sides. 2 The petitioner preferred an application for furlough on
31.3.2016. It was rejected by order dated 18.6.2016. Being
aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal. By
order dated 5.10.2016, the appeal came to be dismissed,
hence, this petition.
3 The appeal came to be dismissed on the ground that
on 28.8.2015 when the petitioner was released on parole for a
period of 30 days, he did not report back in time and ultimately
he was arrested by the police and brought back to the prison.
The second reason for rejecting the application of the
petitioner for parole is that in view of the Notification dated
23.3.2012, prisoners who have been convicted for 'kidnapping'
would not be released on furlough, hence, as the petitioner has
been convicted under Section 364 of IPC, his application for
furlough came to be rejected. In Criminal Writ Petition No.
3325 of 2014 the vires of Notification dated 23.2.2012 was
challenged before this Court. This Court (Coram: Smt.
2 of 3
jdk 3 10.cr.wp.518.17.j.doc
V.K.Tahilramani and Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, JJ.), by judgment
and order dated 5.5.2016, had turned down the said
Notification and held that the Notification was intra vires. In
this view of the matter, we cannot find fault with the
authorities for rejecting the application of the petitioner for
furlough, hence, we are not inclined to interfere. Rule is
discharged. Petition is dismissed.
[ REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. ] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
kandarkar
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!