Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1029 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2017
1 wp3607.11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3607/2011
Mohd. Ilyas Ahmed s/o Abdul Kabeer,
aged about 38 years, Occ. Nil, r/o Sirajgaon
(Band), Tq. Chandur Bazar, Dist. Amravati ...APPELLANT
...V E R S U S...
1. The Municipal Council, Chandur Bazar,
through its Chief Officer, Chandur Bazar,
Dist. Amravati.
2. The Nagar Parishad Urdu Junior College
Arts and Science, Chandur Bazar, thr.
Its Principal, Chandur Bazar, Tq. Chandur
Bazar, Dist. Amravati.
3. The Deputy Director of Education,
Amravati Division, Amravati.
4. The Collector, Amravati District,
District Collectorate, Camp, Amravati,
Dist. Amravati. ...RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri R. J. Mirza, Advocate for petitioner.
Smt. Saboo, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Shri D. P. Thakare, Addl. G. P. for respondent nos. 3 & 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM:- SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED :- MARCH 22, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : Smt. Vasanti A Naik, J.)
By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction
against the respondent-Municipal Council, to continue the
petitioner in the post of Lecturer on ad hoc basis till the regular
2 wp3607.11.odt
appointment is made. The petitioner has also sought a direction
against the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner at
the time of regular appointment by condoning the criteria in
regard to the age as the petitioner has crossed the age limit for
appointment.
Shri R. J. Mirza, the learned counsel for the petitioner,
states that the petitioner would not press the second prayer with
regard to the relaxation of age in this writ petition and would
press the prayer at the subsequent stage, if an occasion arises. It is
stated that the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed if
the relief sought by the petitioner by the first prayer is considered
and granted. We permit the petitioner to delete prayer clause (b)
in view of the said request. The amendment may be carried out
forthwith.
It is stated on behalf of the petitioner in respect of the
prayer that though the petitioner was appointed on ad hoc basis as
a Lecturer in the year 2003 and is continued from time to time, the
respondent-Municipal Council may take steps to terminate the
services of the petitioner and appoint some other ad hoc employee
in his place. It is stated that in view of the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State Of Haryana & Ors.
3 wp3607.11.odt
..vs.. Piara Singh & Ors. reported in (1992) 4 SCC 118 , it would
be necessary for the respondent- Municipal Council to continue the
petitioner on ad hoc basis till the regularly selected candidate is
appointed on the post of Lecturer in the Municipal Council.
The learned Addl. Governmen Pleader and the learned
counsel for the respondent-Municipal Council do not dispute that
the petitioner was appointed on ad hoc basis as a Lecturer from
time to time and is continued in service. It is stated that an
appropriate order may be passed in the circumstances of the case.
Since the relief sought by the petitioner in this writ
petition is limited and the prayer is reasonable, we dispose of the
writ petition with a direction against the Municipal Council to
continue the petitioner as a Lecturer on ad hoc basis till a regularly
selected candidate is appointed in the post held by the petitioner.
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no
order as to costs.
(V. M. Deshpande, J.) (Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J.)
kahale
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!