Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Taslim Maulana Rampure And Anr vs The Education Officer (Primary) ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 3717 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3717 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Taslim Maulana Rampure And Anr vs The Education Officer (Primary) ... on 28 June, 2017
Bench: B.R. Gavai
ssm                                                                        1                 10-wp1984.15.sxw

               IN THE  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 1984 OF 2015


1          Taslim Maulana Rampure,
           Age 24 years, Occu.- Service,
           Residing at 96, Sarvodaya Nagar,
           Mulegaon Road, 
           Solapur.

2          Sanober Rafique Ahmed Mujawar,
           Age 23 years, Occu. Service,
           Residing at, Bhandar Kawata, 
           Tal. South Solapur, Solapur.

           Through its Power of Attorney holder

           Sathi Bashir Ahmed Bashamia Shaikh
           President of Zilla Parishad Kamgar
           Karmachari Union, Solapur.
           Age 43 years, Occu. Service,
           having office at 144, Siddhyeshwar Peth,
           Gala No.6, National Complex,
           Solapur.                                                                     ....Petitioners.


                                 Vs. 


1          Education Officer,
           (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Solapur.

2          Deputy Director of Education,
           Pune Division, Pune,
           Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Road,
           Opposite Lal Deval Pune.


                                                                                                                1/5



        ::: Uploaded on - 04/07/2017                                           ::: Downloaded on - 05/07/2017 23:58:55 :::
 ssm                                                                        2                 10-wp1984.15.sxw

3          The State of Maharashtra,
           Through the Secretary,
           Department of Education,
           Mantralaya, Mumbai.

4          Sarvoday Krida Va Shikshan
           Prasarak Mandal, Sarvade Nagar,
           Mulegaon Road, Solapur.                                                      ....Respondents. 


Mr. A.B. Tajane for the Petitioners.
Mr. Yuvraj Gharal i/by Mr. Vijay Killedar for Respondent No.1.
Mr. V.N. Sagare, AGP for the Respondent State.
Mr. P.B. Kulkarni for Respondent No. 4.


                                 CORAM  :  B.R. GAVAI AND
                                              RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : 28 JUNE 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER-B.R. GAVAI, J.):-

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Heard finally by consent.

2 The Petitioners have approached this Court being

aggrieved by communication dated 7 July 2015 vide which, the

proposal for grant of approval for appointment of Petitioner No.1

came to be rejected. The Petition, in so far as Petitioner No.2 is

concerned, stands withdrawn and therefore, we are only concerned

ssm 3 10-wp1984.15.sxw

with this issue with regard to Petitioner No.1.

3 The Petitioner came to be appointed as "Shikshan Sevak"

on 2 May 2011. It is not in dispute that the Petitioner possesses the

necessary qualification. The Respondent-Management had sent a

proposal to Respondent No.1 for grant of approval of the Petitioner as

Shikshan Sevak. However, as the same was not decided, the Petitioner

was required to approach this Court by way of Writ Petition No. 1984

of 2015. The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 8 May

2015, allowed the Petition and directed the Education Officer-

Respondent No.1 to consider the said proposal.

4 By the impugned order, Respondent No.1. has passed an

order rejecting the proposal on the ground that the Respondent-

Management had failed to absorb the surplus teacher.

5 It is not in dispute that Respondent No.4 is a religious

minority. The issue is no more res-integra. This Court at Aurangabad

Bench in Writ Petition No. 3707 of 2013 (Parbhani Education Society

Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.), vide Judgment dated 2

ssm 4 10-wp1984.15.sxw

September 2013, has held that in so far as the minority institutions

are concerned, the same cannot be forced to absorb the surplus

teachers. The State Government has also issued a Government

Resolution dated 13 July 2016, in pursuance to the said Judgment.

6 In that view of the matter, we find that the rejection of the

approval of Petitioner No.1 on the ground that Respondent No.4 has

not absorbed the surplus teacher, in our view, is not sustainable in law.

7 The Petition is therefore, allowed in the following terms.

a) Respondent No.1 is directed to grant approval of

Petitioner No.1 as "Shikshan Sevak" w.e.f. 2 May

2011.

b) On completion of 3 years of "Shikshan Sevak" i.e.

on 2 May 2014, Petitioner No.1 shall be granted

approval as an Assistant Teacher.

c) Respondent No.1 shall start paying the salary to

Petitioner No.1 as an Assistant Teacher from the

month of August 2017. The arrears in pursuance to

ssm 5 10-wp1984.15.sxw

the aforesaid order shall be paid within a period of

three months from today.

d) Rule made absolute in the aforesaid terms.

        e)           There shall be no order as to costs.



              (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.)                                                 ( B.R. GAVAI J.)









 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter