Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Namdeo Jijoba Agade, Gondia vs The Municipal Council, Gondia & 2 ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 3705 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3705 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Namdeo Jijoba Agade, Gondia vs The Municipal Council, Gondia & 2 ... on 28 June, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
Judgment                                                                                               wp.1538.02

                                                           1



                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                           NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                                  WRIT PETITION N0.1538 /2002

*              Namdeo s/o Jijoba Agade 
               A/a 63 years, occu: Retd.Teacher 
               R/o Ganeshnagar, Gondia, 
               Tah. &  Dist.Gondia                                                            ..PETITIONER.

                                                     VERSUS

1)             The Municipal Council, Gondia
               Dist. Gondia: Through Its Chief Officer

2)             The Education Officer, 
               Zilla Parishad, Gondia, Dist.Gondia. 

3)             Smt.  A.Bux, 
               a/a 60 years, occu: Retd.Teacher 
               R/o Kaka Chowk, Civil Lines, 
               Gondia, Tah. & Dist. Gondia.                                                 ..RESPONDENTS
                                                                                                         . 

.........................................................................................................................
                None for the petitioner.
                Mrs. Geeta Tiwari, Assistant Government Pleader for 
                respondent no.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                               CORAM :  R.K. DESHPANDE &
                                                         MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 28 th June, 2017

ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per R.K. DESHPANDE, J.)

The petitioner claims the relief of grant of deemed date of

promotion to the post of Supervisor with effect from 1.5.1992 and to the

post of Assistant Headmaster with effect from 1.5.1995. He further claims

Judgment wp.1538.02

relief of a direction to the respondents to grant approval to the appointment

of the petitioner as Headmaster with effect from 1.8.1998 till the date of his

retirement i.e. 30.4.1999.

2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was working as an Assistant

Teacher and he was granted deemed date of promotion on the post of

Supervisor with effect from 12.2.1993. He was promoted as Assistant

Headmaster on 1.4.1998 and to the post of Headmaster on 1.8.1998. He

retired from the post of Headmaster with effect from 30.4.1999 upon

attaining the age of superannuation. It is also not in dispute that the

petitioner was granted the pay-scale of selection grade Headmaster with

effect from 1.6.1995.

3. According to the averments made in the petition, one Shri S.A.

Rahim was promoted to the post of Assistant Headmaster in Manohar

Municipal High School and another Ajay Gaur as an Assistant Headmaster

in the Municipal Matatoli High school. According to him, both these persons

were junior to the petitioner and in spite of the fact that there existed one

post, the petitioner was denied promotion. The respondent no.3 -Smt. A.

Bux, was promoted to the post of Headmistress in Municipal Girls' High

School with effect from 8.5.1995.

Judgment wp.1538.02

4. In the absence of challenge to the supersession in the matter of

promotion of the persons junior to the petitioner, we cannot entertain the

claim for grant of deemed date of promotion. The persons who have

superseded the petitioner in promotion, ought to have been made party-

respondents in the petition. We do not find any such challenge raised in the

petition and the persons promoted have also not been joined as party-

respondents, except the respondent no.3-Smt. A. Bux. The promotion of

respondent no.3 as Headmistress in the Girls' School and in the absence of

definite challenge, it is not possible for us to direct grant of deemed date of

promotion to the said post.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No. costs.

                             JUDGE                         JUDGE

sahare





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter