Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.Ranjit Gunwantrao Deshmukh vs Forest Development ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 3453 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3453 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Dr.Ranjit Gunwantrao Deshmukh vs Forest Development ... on 21 June, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                                    1                                 Judg. wp 3512.00.odt 

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
                              NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                                         Writ Petition No.3512 of 2000

              Dr. Ranjit Gunwantrao Deshmukh,
              Aged about 51 years, Occ.-Service,
              R/o.-Forest Development Corporation Colony, 
              at Alapalii, Tah. Aheri, Distt. Gadchiroli (M.S.).     .... Petitioner.

                                                               -Versus-

              1]       Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.,
                       Reg. No.17206/1973-74, Head Office:
                       Rawal Plaza Building Kadbi Chowk, Kamptee Road, 
                       Nagpur (M.S.), through the Secretary.

              2]       The Chairman Board of Directors,
                       Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.,
                       Rawal Plaza Building Kadbi Chowk, 
                       Kamptee Road, Nagpur (M.S.),

              3]       The Managing Director,
                       Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.,
                       Rawal Plaza Building Kadbi Chowk, 
                       Kamptee Road, Nagpur (M.S.),

              4]       The State of Maharashtra,
                       Ministry of Forest and Revenue Mantralaya, 
                       Mumbai-32, through the Secretary.     

              5]       The Governor of Maharashtra,
                       Rajyapal Bhavan, Mumbai (M.S.).                  .... Respondents.




       ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2017                                       ::: Downloaded on - 28/06/2017 00:15:50 :::
                                                     2                                 Judg. wp 3512.00.odt 

              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Shri V.P. Maldhure, Assistant Government Pleader for 
              respondent nos. 4 and 5.
               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Coram : R. K. Deshpande & 
                             Mrs. Swapna Joshi, JJ.
               Dated  : 21    June, 2017
                              st
                                           

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R. K. Deshpande, J.)

This petition claims the relief as under :-

"(i) pass appropriate writ, direction or order and direct the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner as per fifty pay commission recommendations with effect from 01.01.1996, as per Resolution of the Board of Directors of respondent No.1.-Company at Annexure-I.;

(ii) grant any other relief to the petitioner deemed necessary by this Hon'ble Court in the circumstances of the case;

(iii) Direct the respondent No.4 to grant approval to the resolution passed on 30.06.1999 by the respondent no.1 company in it's 107th Board meeting by which Respondent no.1 Company resolved to apply pay-scale to it's employees and officers as per Fifth Pay Commissioners' recommendations."


              2]       The petition was filed in the year 2000 and it was admitted  on





                                                     3                                 Judg. wp 3512.00.odt 

31-07-2001. On 12-06-2017, this Court passed an order as under :-

"Put up this matter on 19.06.2017 at the request of Shri V.P. Maldhure, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Forest Development Corporation."

3] In response to the aforesaid order, Shri Maldhure, the learned

Assistant Government Pleader for the Forest Development

Corporation of Maharashtra Limited [for short, the "FDCM") makes

a statement that the pay scales as recommended by 5th Pay

Commission were made applicable to the employees and the officers

working under the respondent-FDCM as per the resolution dated

30-6-1999 which was adopted by the respondent-FDCM. He submits

that all the arrears of salary and benefits available as per the 5th Pay

Commission have already been disbursed to the petitioner. None

appears for the petitioner for verifying such a statement. However,

we do not have any doubt about such statement made before this

Court.

4] In view of above, the petition is disposed of as the grievance

of the petitioner does not survive.

Deshmukh                            JUDGE                                             JUDGE





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter