Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3391 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2017
wp4952.13.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4952/2013
PETITIONER : Raghvendrasingh s/o Chandansingh Bais
Aged about 52 years, Secretary, Agriculture
Produce Market Committee, Tiroda,
Tah. Tiroda, District Gondia.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS : 1. State of Maharashtra,
Co-op. Marketing & Textile Department,
Through its Secretary, Mantralaya,
Mumbai : 32.
2. Managing Director,
Maharashtra State Agricultural
Market Board, Plot No.7, Market
Yard, Gool Tekdi, Pune - 411037.
3. Director of Agricultural Marketing
Office of the Director Agricultural
Marketing Maharashtra State, 3rd Floor
New Central Building, Pune - 411001.
4. Agriculture Produce Market Committee,
Tiroda, Tq. Tiroda, District Gondia.
5. Bapu s/o Uttam Kotwal,
Aged about - Major, R/o At Post :
Astapur, Tq. Haveli, District Pune.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri I.J. Damle, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 3
Shri A.P. Kalmegh, Advocate for respondent no.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.
DATE : 20.06.2017
wp4952.13.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the orders of
the State Government and the respondent no.2 - Maharashtra State
Agricultural Marketing Board, dated 15.7.2013 and 27.8.2013
respectively.
During the pendency of the writ petition, by an order dated
10.12.2013, we had directed the Agriculture Produce Market Committees
to forward the proposal of the Secretaries for grant of approval to their
appointment to the Director of Marketing and had directed the Director of
Marketing to examine the proposal and take a necessary decision within a
particular time. It appears that in all the connected cases a decision is
taken by the Director of Marketing and the proposal pertaining to the
appointment of the Secretaries was approved. It appears that the approval
is granted to the appointment of the Secretaries of the A.P.M.C. in all the
connected matters. It is also pointed out that the impugned order of the
State Government dated 15.7.2013 has been cancelled by the Government
Resolution dated 21.4.2017.
In view of the aforesaid, it is most likely that the cause for
filing this petition would not survive, inasmuch as the grievance of the
petitioner would stand redressed.
wp4952.13.odt
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with
no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!