Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3182 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2017
Cri.W.P.515/2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.515 OF 2017
1, Bharat s/o Pratap Shinde,
Age 45 years, Occu.Agri.,
2. Rajashree Santosh Patil,
Age 34 years, Occu. Household
[3] Chandrakant s/o Bhagwat Patil } Petition of is
Age 45 years, Occu. Agri., } petr.Nos.3 to 5
} is rejected as
} per Court's
[4] Sunita w/o Anant Chaudhary, } order dated
Age 42 years, Occu. Household } 18.4.2017
All R/o Mamurabad,
Taluka and District Jalgaon
[5] Vyankatrao s/o Uttamrao Mundhe,
Age 55 years, Occu. Business,
R/o Rohit Construction, Bhavsar
Chowk, Near Old Post Office,
Nanded .. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
and anr. .. Respondents
Mr K.D. Bade Patil, Advocate for petitioners
Mr K.D. Mundhe, A.P.P. for respondent no.1
Mr Girish Nagori, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND
A.M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE : 14th June 2017
PER COURT
Heard.
2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties,
petition is taken up for final disposal at admission stage.
Cri.W.P.515/2017
3. The petitioners are praying for quashment of the criminal
proceedings initiated in pursuance to lodging of F.I.R. bearing
No.8/2017 registered at Taluka Police Station, Jalgaon, District Jalgaon
on 1st February 2017 for commission of offences punishable under
Sections 403, 406, 420, 447-A and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.
The offence is registered in pursuance to the directions issued by the
Magistrate, in exercise of powers under Section 156 (3) of the Code of
Criminal procedure on 30th January 2017 in Criminal Application
No.1026 of 2016.
4. The allegations levelled against the petitioners relate to
execution of work of Mamurabad Drinking Water Supply Scheme. It
appears that the petitioner No.1 was office bearer of the Water
Management Committee of the same village between 2011 to 2015.
The alleged work appears to have been executed during the tenure of
the office bearers including petitioner No.1. It would be appropriate
for the petitioner no.1 to avail of the remedies available in law after
presentation of the charge-sheet and as such truthfulness or
otherwise of the allegations levelled against petitioner No.1 need not
be gone into.
5. So far as the petitioner no.2 is concerned, it has been brought
to our notice that she was not office bearer of the committee or the
village panchayat at any point of time. She did not have any authority
to deal with the funds released by the village panchayat or State
Government for execution of the work. The petitioner No.2 does not
appear to be connected with the alleged work of water management
Cri.W.P.515/2017
committee of the concerned village. There is no reason for
implicating petitioner No.2 and as such, criminal proceedings initiated
against her deserve to be quashed.
6. In the result, the application tendered by the petitioner No.1
stands disposed of with liberty to avail of the remedies available in
law, after filing of charge-sheet.
7. The application tendered by the petitioner No.2 deserves to be
allowed and same is accordingly allowed. The criminal proceedings
initiated against the petitioner No.2 in pursuance of registration of the
F.I.R. bearing No.8/2017 at Taluka Police Station, Jalgaon, District
Jalgaon on 1st February 2017 for commission of offences punishable
under Sections 403, 406, 420, 447-A and 120-B of the Indian Penal
Code stand quashed.
8. Rule is made absolute, as specified above.
( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( R.M. BORDE, J.) vvr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!